chore(rag): add eval knowledge base mirror
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: AIOps Alert Scope Control
|
||||
keywords: [alert payload, unrelated active alerts, scope control]
|
||||
summary: Keep diagnosis scoped to the request payload and avoid diagnosing unrelated active alerts.
|
||||
category: aiops
|
||||
source: aiops-alert-scope-control
|
||||
breadcrumb: AIOps > Alert Scope Control
|
||||
kb_scope: rag-eval
|
||||
covers: [alert scope, payload, active alerts]
|
||||
when_to_retrieve: Use when an AIOps request includes a concrete alert payload and scope boundaries matter.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AIOps
|
||||
|
||||
## Alert Scope Control
|
||||
|
||||
When an AIOps request already includes an alert payload, the agent should diagnose that payload first.
|
||||
It must not expand the task into unrelated active alerts unless the user asks for broad alert triage.
|
||||
|
||||
Scope rules:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Treat the provided payload as the primary incident boundary.
|
||||
2. Use unrelated active alerts only as correlation evidence when they share service, dependency, time window, or trace context.
|
||||
3. Do not replace the requested alert with a louder but unrelated alert.
|
||||
|
||||
This runbook anchors payload, unrelated active alerts, and scope behavior.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Payment Service Latency Alert
|
||||
keywords: [HighLatency, payment-service, p95 latency, downstream dependency]
|
||||
summary: Diagnose payment-service p95 latency alerts and identify downstream dependency bottlenecks.
|
||||
category: aiops
|
||||
source: payment-service-latency
|
||||
breadcrumb: AIOps > Service Alerts > Payment Latency
|
||||
kb_scope: rag-eval
|
||||
covers: [payment-service, latency, downstream dependency]
|
||||
when_to_retrieve: Use when an alert mentions payment-service, HighLatency, or elevated p95 latency.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# AIOps
|
||||
|
||||
## Service Alerts
|
||||
|
||||
### Payment Latency
|
||||
|
||||
For `HighLatency` alerts on `payment-service`, treat p95 latency as the primary symptom.
|
||||
|
||||
Diagnosis steps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Confirm whether p95 latency is isolated to payment-service or shared across upstream callers.
|
||||
2. Compare payment-service latency with downstream dependency latency for gateway, risk, and order services.
|
||||
3. Check connection pool wait time, retry spikes, and timeout rates.
|
||||
4. If downstream dependency latency increased first, classify payment-service as affected rather than root cause.
|
||||
|
||||
The expected evidence terms are p95 latency, payment-service, and downstream dependency.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user