osiman/SuperBizAgent-java
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(mvp): organize mvp documentation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
zhuyongxin
2026-07-09 13:40:08 +08:00
parent 9c9a0024d4
commit 841437fa06
57 changed files with 452 additions and 675 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
openspec/changes/archive/2026-07-08-executor-composer-final-answer/decisions.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
| Source | Alignment |
|---|---|
| Issue objective | Stage four in `mvp/issues/executor-structured-output-v2.md` requires Composer output final answer from Verifier-allowed material. Covered by proposal, design, specs, and tasks. |
| Issue objective | Stage four in `mvp/issues/design-notes/executor-structured-output-v2.md` requires Composer output final answer from Verifier-allowed material. Covered by proposal, design, specs, and tasks. |
| Proposal -> design | Proposal says Composer owns final expression; design defines input filtering, output parsing, fallback, and audit. |
| Design -> specs | Design decisions are reflected in `chat-composer-agent` requirements and modified `chat-verifier-agent` routing requirements. |
| Specs -> tasks | Each required behavior has implementation and test tasks, including malformed fallback and no raw output leakage. |
openspec/changes/archive/2026-07-08-verifier-evidence-reference-fidelity/decisions.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
## Discover Context
- Source issue: `mvp/issues/ISS-007-verifier-evidence-summary-fidelity.md`.
- Source issue: `mvp/issues/archived/ISS-007-verifier-evidence-summary-fidelity.md`.
- Related existing specs: `chat-verifier-agent`, `evidence-trace-hardening`.
- Related devflow records: `executor-gatekeeper-hook`, `executor-verifier-claim-checks`, `executor-composer-final-answer`, `evidence-trace-hardening`.
- Current repo instruction requested semantic code search and LSP confirmation before code changes; those tools are not exposed in this environment, so implementation will use `rg`, direct code reading, and focused tests as fallback evidence.