docs(openspec): propose interview demo quality audit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Verifier SHALL be observable
|
||||
The Verifier's verdict SHALL be persisted for observability.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: prompt audit written to verifier evaluation
|
||||
- **WHEN** the Chat verifier evaluation is persisted
|
||||
- **THEN** the system SHALL include a `prompt_audit` object under `diagnosis_session.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation`
|
||||
- **AND** `prompt_audit.version` SHALL identify the Chat prompt audit catalog version
|
||||
- **AND** `prompt_audit.prompts` SHALL include the planner, executor, verifier, and composer prompt names and versions
|
||||
- **AND** full prompt text SHALL NOT be persisted in `prompt_audit`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: prompt audit available on fallback paths
|
||||
- **WHEN** Chat verifier parsing fails, Composer parsing fails, or Chat produces a degraded answer
|
||||
- **THEN** the persisted verifier evaluation SHALL still include `prompt_audit`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Diagnosis eval SHALL validate trace fixtures deterministically
|
||||
The diagnosis eval harness SHALL evaluate saved trace fixtures without invoking an LLM judge.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: prompt audit assertions are enforced
|
||||
- **WHEN** an eval case sets `requirePromptAudit=true`
|
||||
- **THEN** the evaluator SHALL require `verifier_evaluation.prompt_audit.version`
|
||||
- **AND** when `expectedPromptAuditVersion` is configured, it SHALL match exactly
|
||||
- **AND** when `expectedPromptVersions` is configured, each configured prompt name SHALL appear with the expected version
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Gatekeeper rule metadata assertions are enforced
|
||||
- **WHEN** an eval case sets `requireGatekeeperRules=true`
|
||||
- **THEN** the evaluator SHALL require `verifier_evaluation.gatekeeper_result.rules` to be non-empty
|
||||
- **AND** each rule item SHALL include `id`, `enabled`, and `default_severity`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: expanded baseline remains passing
|
||||
- **WHEN** the committed fixture set is evaluated
|
||||
- **THEN** every case SHALL pass
|
||||
- **AND** baseline JSON and Markdown reports SHALL reflect the expanded case count and verdict distribution
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
## MODIFIED Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: MVP demo SHALL be reproducible for interviews
|
||||
The MVP demo SHALL provide a repeatable way to show a diagnosis answer, trace, verifier evaluation, and feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: interview demo check script records an evidence bundle
|
||||
- **WHEN** the user runs the interview demo check script against a running `mvp-demo` service
|
||||
- **THEN** the script SHALL submit a fixed Chat diagnosis request
|
||||
- **AND** it SHALL fetch the trace for the same session id
|
||||
- **AND** it SHALL submit useful feedback for that session
|
||||
- **AND** it SHALL write chat, trace, feedback, and summary outputs under `mvp/demo/output/`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: interview demo check fails with actionable readiness output
|
||||
- **WHEN** the target service is not reachable
|
||||
- **THEN** the script SHALL fail before issuing diagnosis requests
|
||||
- **AND** the failure message SHALL name the base URL and the expected startup profile
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: interview documentation explains audit fields
|
||||
- **WHEN** an interviewer asks how prompt or Gatekeeper changes are audited
|
||||
- **THEN** the demo documentation SHALL point to `prompt_audit.version` and `gatekeeper_result.rule_set_version`
|
||||
- **AND** it SHALL explain that deterministic eval fixtures are the regression source of truth
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user