## MODIFIED Requirements ### Requirement: Verifier SHALL fact-check Executor answers The system SHALL have a Verifier Agent that reads only Gatekeeper-projected structured Executor claims and verified claim-local evidence, then produces a structured verdict based on claim derivability. #### Scenario: PASS verdict when all claims have evidence - **WHEN** all critical claims in `verified_executor_output.claims` have direct observation or reasonable inference support in `verified_evidence` - **AND** at least one critical claim has direct observation - **AND** no critical claim is contradicted, unsupported, external unknown, or overstated - **AND** verdict ceiling is PASS - **THEN** the Verifier MAY output model verdict="PASS" with groundedness_score ≥ 0.5 #### Scenario: LOW_CONFID verdict with partial evidence - **WHEN** no critical claim contradicts verified evidence - **AND** some critical claims are `unsupported`, `external_unknown`, or `overstated` - **THEN** the Verifier SHALL output model verdict="LOW_CONFID" #### Scenario: LOW_CONFID verdict with only inference support - **WHEN** no critical claim contradicts verified evidence - **AND** all critical claims are only `reasonable_inference` - **THEN** the Verifier SHALL output model verdict="LOW_CONFID" #### Scenario: REJECT verdict when claims contradict evidence - **WHEN** any critical claim in `verified_executor_output.claims` contradicts verified evidence - **OR** the claim fabricates a key entity, error code, or conclusion that does not exist in verified evidence - **THEN** the Verifier SHALL output model verdict="REJECT" #### Scenario: Verified structured claims are the only verification target - **WHEN** `verified_executor_output.claims` is present - **THEN** Verifier SHALL verify each structured claim against matching `verified_evidence` through `claim_checks` - **AND** each claim's evidence references SHALL match existing claim/invocation/tool/path identifiers when available - **AND** a claim without matching verified evidence SHALL NOT be classified as `direct_observation` - **AND** Verifier SHALL NOT receive or add confirmed facts from raw Executor text #### Scenario: Executor output is invalid - **WHEN** Executor does not return a legal structured contract - **THEN** the Graph SHALL route directly to pre-verification Fallback - **AND** Verifier SHALL NOT execute or fabricate a diagnostic verdict ### Requirement: facts_checked SHALL use a fixed classification set The system SHALL continue to expose compatibility `facts_checked` using its fixed verification classification set. #### Scenario: claim checks are mapped to legacy facts - **WHEN** Verifier output contains `claim_checks` - **THEN** the shared Verifier protocol parser SHALL derive compatibility `facts_checked` when the model did not provide them - **AND** `direct_observation` SHALL map to `direct_evidence` - **AND** `reasonable_inference` and `overstated` SHALL map to `indirect_support` - **AND** `unsupported` and `external_unknown` SHALL map to `no_evidence` - **AND** `contradicted` SHALL map to `contradicted` ### Requirement: ChatService SHALL route based on Verifier verdict The system SHALL use Diagnosis StateGraph conditional edges, rather than a ChatService outer loop, to route explicit Verifier execution status and effective verdict. #### Scenario: PASS routes to Composer - **WHEN** Verifier completes with effective verdict="PASS" - **THEN** the Graph SHALL invoke Composer with filtered Verifier-allowed material - **AND** the final user-facing answer SHALL NOT pass through raw Executor output - **AND** the final user-facing answer SHALL NOT read Executor `user_facing_answer` #### Scenario: LOW_CONFID does not qualify for evidence retry - **WHEN** Verifier completes LOW_CONFID but ceiling is LOW_CONFID, no valid critical evidence gap exists, or evidence retry count is already one - **THEN** the Graph SHALL route to Composer without another Planner cycle - **AND** the final answer SHALL distinguish confirmed information, possible directions, and evidence gaps #### Scenario: LOW_CONFID qualifies for evidence retry - **WHEN** Verifier completes LOW_CONFID with ceiling PASS, at least one critical valid evidence gap, and evidence retry count zero - **THEN** the Graph SHALL invoke one EVIDENCE_GAP_ONLY Planner cycle - **AND** it SHALL NOT use groundedness threshold or a ChatService feature flag to decide the retry #### Scenario: REJECT does not enter retry round - **WHEN** Verifier completes with effective verdict="REJECT" - **THEN** the Graph SHALL NOT start an evidence supplementation round - **AND** it SHALL route to Composer-safe output #### Scenario: REJECT produces bounded output - **WHEN** effective verdict is REJECT - **THEN** the system SHALL output a degraded result indicating current evidence cannot support a reliable conclusion - **AND** it SHALL NOT pass through raw Executor answer - **AND** it SHALL NOT include an unsupported root-cause conclusion #### Scenario: Verifier execution fails - **WHEN** Verifier exhausts technical retry or returns a non-retryable failure - **THEN** the Graph SHALL route to pre-verification Fallback - **AND** no execution status string SHALL be used as model or effective verdict ### Requirement: Verifier SHALL be observable The Verifier execution, effective verdict, and downstream final-answer composition SHALL be persisted in the current Diagnosis Run self-evaluation container. #### Scenario: claim checks written to self_evaluation - **WHEN** a completed Verifier evaluation is persisted - **THEN** `diagnosis_run.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation` SHALL include `claim_checks` - **AND** it SHALL continue to include compatibility `facts_checked` - **AND** it SHALL include `verifier_status`, `model_verdict`, `effective_verdict`, `verdict`, `groundedness_score`, `rationale`, verified output/evidence, and Gatekeeper audit #### Scenario: composer output written to self_evaluation - **WHEN** final answer composition completes - **THEN** `diagnosis_run.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation` SHALL include compact `composer_output` when available - **AND** handled Composer fallback SHALL remain observable through orchestration trace and status/reason fields - **AND** existing claim/fact and Gatekeeper fields SHALL be preserved #### Scenario: verdict written to self_evaluation - **WHEN** Verifier completes - **THEN** Graph result mapping SHALL write effective verdict under `diagnosis_run.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation.verdict` - **AND** existing `rule_evaluation` and `aiops_rule_evaluation` channels SHALL be preserved #### Scenario: pre-verification fallback is persisted - **WHEN** Graph reaches Fallback before Verifier completes - **THEN** verifier evaluation SHALL include available status, Gatekeeper audit, failure reason, and Prompt audit - **AND** it SHALL NOT fabricate `model_verdict` or `effective_verdict` #### Scenario: gatekeeper result written to self_evaluation - **WHEN** Graph result mapping persists available Gatekeeper state - **THEN** `diagnosis_run.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation` SHALL include `gatekeeper_result` - **AND** the result SHALL retain status, severity, checked bindings, rules, failed rules, warnings, and errors when provided by Gatekeeper #### Scenario: prompt audit written to verifier evaluation - **WHEN** a complex Chat Graph result is persisted - **THEN** the system SHALL include a `prompt_audit` object under `diagnosis_run.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation` - **AND** `prompt_audit.version` SHALL identify the Chat Prompt audit catalog version - **AND** `prompt_audit.prompts` SHALL include Planner, Executor, Verifier, and Composer Prompt names and versions - **AND** full Prompt text SHALL NOT be persisted #### Scenario: prompt audit available on fallback paths - **WHEN** Planner, Executor, Gatekeeper, Verifier, or Composer reaches a handled Fallback - **THEN** the persisted verifier evaluation SHALL still include `prompt_audit` #### Scenario: evaluation payload is inspected - **WHEN** Graph verifier evaluation is persisted - **THEN** it SHALL NOT contain raw Executor text or complete `tool_trace_summary` - **AND** compatibility `executor_structured_output` SHALL contain at most the verified projection ### Requirement: Verifier SHALL consume explicit verification inputs The Verifier SHALL receive a Graph-built verified-only payload rather than inferring business inputs from conversation history, ThreadLocal state, raw Executor text, or complete tool history. #### Scenario: explicit input blocks available to Verifier - **WHEN** the Verifier Graph Node starts - **THEN** the payload SHALL provide `diagnosis_context`, `verified_executor_output`, `verified_evidence`, `gatekeeper_audit`, and `verdict_ceiling` - **AND** permitted structured `retry_context` SHALL be provided only after evidence retry preparation #### Scenario: Verifier remains isolated from intermediate and raw material - **WHEN** the Verifier input is serialized - **THEN** it SHALL exclude Planner reasoning, Executor intermediate reasoning, raw Executor text, complete tool trace summary, Prompt text, and unrelated parent Graph State #### Scenario: only passed bindings are available - **WHEN** Gatekeeper returns mixed passed and failed checked bindings - **THEN** `verified_executor_output` and `verified_evidence` SHALL contain only claims/material matching passed bindings - **AND** the Verifier SHALL NOT receive failed or unreferenced tool material #### Scenario: verified evidence preserves precise references - **WHEN** the system prepares Verifier input - **THEN** each verified evidence item SHALL preserve claim id, source invocation id, tool name, raw path, and matched text - **AND** the item SHALL be traceable to current-run Gatekeeper validation #### Scenario: gatekeeper audit and ceiling are available - **WHEN** the system prepares Verifier input - **THEN** the payload SHALL include raw Gatekeeper audit separately from normalized verdict ceiling - **AND** a LOW_CONFID ceiling SHALL prevent effective PASS #### Scenario: technical retry occurs - **WHEN** the first Verifier attempt returns invalid output or a retryable invocation failure - **THEN** the second attempt SHALL receive byte-identical serialized input - **AND** Executor, Gatekeeper, and tools SHALL NOT rerun ### Requirement: Verifier facts SHALL be auditable Verifier claims and facts SHALL be linkable to the verified binding projection used during verification. #### Scenario: claim checks contain evidence refs - **WHEN** the Verifier emits `claim_checks` - **THEN** each check SHALL include an `evidence_refs` array - **AND** any non-empty evidence ref SHALL correspond to existing verified evidence by claim id, source invocation id, tool name, or raw path - **AND** it SHALL NOT reference a failed or unverified binding #### Scenario: verifier evaluation persists traceability snapshot - **WHEN** Graph result mapping persists verifier evaluation - **THEN** it SHALL include `traceability_version` - **AND** it SHALL include the bounded `verified_evidence` snapshot used by the Verifier - **AND** it SHALL NOT persist a complete tool trace summary as Verifier input ### Requirement: Structured Executor output SHALL degrade safely The StateGraph runtime SHALL tolerate malformed or absent structured Executor output without crashing the Chat flow or invoking Verifier with untrusted material. #### Scenario: Malformed Executor JSON is classified - **WHEN** Executor returns malformed JSON or text outside the expected contract - **THEN** Executor Node SHALL set INVALID_OUTPUT - **AND** the Graph SHALL route directly to deterministic pre-verification Fallback - **AND** Gatekeeper, Verifier, and model Composer SHALL NOT execute #### Scenario: Structured parse failure remains observable - **WHEN** Executor output parsing fails - **THEN** orchestration events and verifier evaluation status/failure fields SHALL make the parse failure visible - **AND** the failure SHALL NOT be treated as a successful evidence-attribution contract or diagnostic verdict ### Requirement: Executor Gatekeeper SHALL validate deterministic structured-output failures The system SHALL run deterministic Gatekeeper checks as an explicit Graph Node after legal Executor output parsing and before Verifier model execution. #### Scenario: schema rule rejects removed fields - **WHEN** Executor structured output contains `diagnosis_summary` or `user_facing_answer` - **THEN** `gatekeeper_result.status` SHALL be `fail` - **AND** `gatekeeper_result.failed_rules` SHALL contain `schema.executor_v2` #### Scenario: schema rule rejects missing evidence bindings - **WHEN** a confirmed claim has no `evidence_bindings` - **THEN** `gatekeeper_result.status` SHALL be `fail` - **AND** `gatekeeper_result.failed_rules` SHALL contain `schema.executor_v2` #### Scenario: invocation rule rejects fabricated invocation ids - **WHEN** a claim evidence binding references an invocation id absent from current-run `tool_invocation` rows - **THEN** `gatekeeper_result.status` SHALL be `fail` - **AND** `gatekeeper_result.failed_rules` SHALL contain `evidence.invocation_ref` #### Scenario: invocation rule rejects tool name mismatch - **WHEN** a claim evidence binding references an existing current-run invocation id - **AND** binding `tool_name` does not match persisted invocation `tool_name` - **THEN** `gatekeeper_result.status` SHALL be `fail` - **AND** `gatekeeper_result.failed_rules` SHALL contain `evidence.invocation_ref` #### Scenario: valid structured output passes initial gatekeeper rules - **WHEN** Executor emits legal `executor_evidence_v2` - **AND** each claim has evidence bindings pointing to current-run invocations with matching tool names and paths - **THEN** `gatekeeper_result.status` SHALL be `pass` - **AND** `gatekeeper_result.failed_rules` SHALL be empty #### Scenario: gatekeeper reject bypasses Verifier - **WHEN** normalized Gatekeeper status is REJECT - **THEN** the Graph SHALL route directly to pre-verification Fallback - **AND** Verifier SHALL NOT execute #### Scenario: gatekeeper low confidence is bounded - **WHEN** normalized Gatekeeper status is LOW_CONFID with at least one passed binding - **THEN** verified input SHALL contain only passed bindings - **AND** effective verdict SHALL NOT exceed LOW_CONFID ### Requirement: Verifier SHALL use verified claim-local evidence for derivability Verifier SHALL judge structured claims only against Gatekeeper-verified claim-local evidence excerpts and their precise current-run references. #### Scenario: Verified excerpt supports direct observation - **WHEN** verdict ceiling is PASS - **AND** a claim's verified evidence matched text directly contains the claim's concrete facts - **THEN** Verifier MAY classify that claim as `direct_observation` #### Scenario: Verified evidence is complete Verifier context - **WHEN** verified claims and evidence are available - **THEN** Verifier SHALL use them as its evidence context - **AND** it SHALL NOT require or request a complete tool trace summary - **AND** it SHALL NOT read raw Executor or unreferenced tool material ### Requirement: Gatekeeper severity SHALL constrain effective verdict Runtime effective verdict calculation SHALL treat normalized Gatekeeper ceiling as a hard upper bound independent from Verifier model output. #### Scenario: Reject severity bypasses Verifier - **WHEN** `gatekeeper_result.severity=reject` - **THEN** the Graph SHALL route to pre-verification Fallback without invoking Verifier - **AND** it SHALL NOT fabricate an effective diagnostic verdict #### Scenario: Low confidence severity prevents PASS - **WHEN** `gatekeeper_result.severity=low_confid` - **AND** the Verifier model returns `verdict=PASS` - **THEN** deterministic effective-verdict calculation SHALL downgrade the result - **AND** effective verdict SHALL be `LOW_CONFID` #### Scenario: Gatekeeper audit includes severity - **WHEN** Graph verifier evaluation is persisted - **THEN** `diagnosis_run.self_evaluation.verifier_evaluation.gatekeeper_result` SHALL include available `status`, `severity`, `checked_bindings`, `failed_rules`, `warnings`, and `errors`