docs: polish digest output workflow rules
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,7 +56,13 @@ Produce two output views from the same run, preferably in **one generation step*
|
||||
1. **Public digest** — for Hugo / public browsing
|
||||
2. **Internal review digest** — for chat reporting and operator decisions
|
||||
|
||||
Write only the public digest into Hugo using this structure:
|
||||
Before publishing, persist digest outputs back into the same reader run directory under:
|
||||
|
||||
- `outputs/freshrss/rerun/<run-id>/digest/public_digest.md`
|
||||
- `outputs/freshrss/rerun/<run-id>/digest/internal_review_digest.md`
|
||||
- `outputs/freshrss/rerun/<run-id>/digest/combined.json`
|
||||
|
||||
Then write only the public digest into Hugo using this structure:
|
||||
|
||||
- `content/daily/YYYY-MM-DD/index.md`
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -69,7 +75,6 @@ Recommended **public digest** structure:
|
||||
- `今日重点`
|
||||
- `趋势观察`
|
||||
- `延伸阅读`
|
||||
- `信息来源`
|
||||
|
||||
Public digest writing rules:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -79,6 +84,7 @@ Public digest writing rules:
|
||||
- Do **not** expose internal workflow labels or operator language such as `待确认`, `建议沉淀到 IMA`, `keep/review/drop`, or `selection_decision`.
|
||||
- Prefer concise but information-dense writing.
|
||||
- For each item under `今日重点`, include not only summary and highlights, but also one short editor-style value sentence, for example: `这篇内容更值得关注的原因在于……`.
|
||||
- When rendering highlights in public digest, prefer a short label such as `值得关注:` followed by one item per line, instead of packing multiple points into a single long sentence.
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended **internal review digest** structure:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user