feat: add traceable scoped AIOps diagnosis

2026-07-04 22:57:28 +08:00
parent 246c99b954
commit 23ee05c7c3
32 changed files with 1179 additions and 25 deletions
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 | 日期 | slug | 领域 | 关键词 | 状态 |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
 | 2026-07-03 | mvp-demo-trace-acceptance | MVP Demo/trace/acceptance | mvp-demo, trace API, diagnosis_session, agent_step, tool_invocation, feedback | openspec/changes/archive/2026-07-03-mvp-demo-trace-acceptance | archived |
+| 2026-07-04 | aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry | AIOps/trace/alert diagnosis | ai_ops, SSE, alert input, sessionId, diagnosis_session, trace API | openspec/changes/archive/2026-07-04-aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry | archived |
+| 2026-07-04 | aiops-alert-scope-control | AIOps/scope/prompt control | payload mode, auto-discovery mode, queryPrometheusAlerts, HighCPUUsage | openspec/changes/archive/2026-07-04-aiops-alert-scope-control | archived |
 | 2026-05-29 | chatmodel-abstraction | 解耦/多模型路由 | ChatModel, EmbeddingModel, DeepSeek, BGE-M3, SiliconFlow, Spring AI | archived |
 | 2026-06-23 | phase1-infrastructure | 基础设施/文档管理 | MySQL, Redis, Milvus, Flyway, JPA, 向量检索, 类别过滤 | archived |
 | 2026-06-24 | lookup-knowledge-integration | 知识库检索 | L0精确匹配, L1语义检索, frontmatter, 混合检索 | archived |
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+# Acceptance: aiops-alert-scope-control
+
+## Verification
+
+- [x] Payload-mode prompt focuses the final report on the supplied alert.
+- [x] No-payload prompt requires active-alert discovery first.
+- [x] Targeted tests pass.
+- [x] Compile passes.
+- [x] OpenSpec validates.
+
+## Known Limits
+
+- Prompt-only scope control may still require runtime observation.
+- AIOps Verifier remains deferred.
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Brief: aiops-alert-scope-control
+
+## Background
+
+After `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`, AIOps can be triggered by payload and replayed through trace. Runtime verification showed one semantic gap: payload mode still produced a broad report over all active mock alerts.
+
+## Goal
+
+Make AIOps scope explicit:
+
+- Payload present -> targeted diagnosis for the supplied alert.
+- Payload absent -> automatic active-alert discovery and diagnosis.
+
+## Scope
+
+- In scope:
+  - `AiOpsService.buildTaskPrompt(...)` scope rules.
+  - Focused tests.
+  - Demo acceptance wording.
+- Out of scope:
+  - Verifier integration.
+  - Java-side filtering of tool results.
+  - API shape changes.
+  - Database changes.
+
+## Related OpenSpec
+
+`openspec/changes/aiops-alert-scope-control/`
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Decisions: aiops-alert-scope-control
+
+## Clarify
+
+- Entry summary: tighten AIOps report scope after runtime verification showed payload mode still analyzes all active alerts.
+- Slug: `aiops-alert-scope-control`
+- Scale: standard-light.
+
+## Context
+
+- AIOps traceability is implemented and verified.
+- Mock Prometheus returns multiple active alerts.
+- Payload demo supplies `HighCPUUsage/payment-service`, but previous report expanded to `HighMemoryUsage` and `SlowResponse`.
+
+## Grill Question Pool
+
+| # | Dimension | Question | Mode | Status |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Q1 | Product Boundary | What makes `/api/ai_ops` different from `/api/chat` when payload exists? | evidence-driven | Payload is alert-event driven and should be scoped to that event. |
+| Q2 | Scope | Should payload mode ignore all other active alerts? | user-interview | No; mention only as related risk/context. |
+| Q3 | Compatibility | Should no-payload mode keep old "query active alerts" behavior? | evidence-driven | Yes. |
+| Q4 | Enforcement | Should Java filter unrelated tool results now? | evidence-driven | No; prompt-only is sufficient for this small change. |
+| Q5 | Verifier | Should this change add AIOps Verifier? | user-interview | No; keep deferred. |
+
+## Evidence-Driven Conclusions
+
+| Conclusion | Evidence Source | Result |
+|---|---|---|
+| Scope issue is prompt-level. | `/api_ ai_ops` trace showed all mock alerts analyzed despite payload. | Update task prompt. |
+| No API or persistence changes are needed. | `AIOpsRequest` already carries payload and trace works. | Keep endpoint unchanged. |
+| Blast radius is low. | `buildTaskPrompt(...)` is internal to `AiOpsService`. | Add tests for prompt content. |
+
+## GitNexus
+
+GitNexus remains skipped by prior user decision and because tools are not exposed in this session. Local impact analysis is recorded instead.
+
+## Key Decisions
+
+- Payload mode is detected when any alert field is present.
+- Payload mode final report must focus on the supplied alert.
+- No-payload mode must first call `queryPrometheusAlerts`.
+- Other active alerts in payload mode can appear only as related risk, not as separate root-cause sections.
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Evidence: aiops-alert-scope-control
+
+## Local Impact Analysis
+
+- `AiOpsService.buildTaskPrompt(...)` is used by `executeAiOpsAnalysis(...)`.
+- No controller, DTO, repository, or database changes are required.
+- Existing `AiOpsServiceTest` already exercises request summary helpers and can be extended for scope prompt rules.
+
+## Verification Results
+
+- `mvn -q "-Dtest=AiOpsServiceTest" test` passed.
+- `mvn -q -DskipTests compile` passed.
+- `openspec.cmd validate aiops-alert-scope-control --strict` passed.
+
+## Runtime Verification
+
+- Runtime session: `mvp-demo-aiops-payment-cpu-codex-scope-003`.
+- `/api/ai_ops` SSE emitted the requested `session` message and finished with `done`.
+- `diagnosis_session` persisted:
+  - `agent_flow = AI_OPS`
+  - `status = SUCCESS`
+  - `total_duration_ms = 69875`
+  - `step_count = 5`
+  - `tool_call_count = 8`
+- Tool invocation counts:
+  - `query_metrics = 1`
+  - `lookup_knowledge = 1`
+  - `query_logs = 6`
+- Report scope check:
+  - `告警根因分析 - HighCPUUsage` exists.
+  - `告警根因分析 - HighMemoryUsage` does not exist.
+  - `告警根因分析 - SlowResponse` does not exist.
+  - `相关风险告警` exists.
+
+## Runtime Fix
+
+- Added Hikari settings in `src/main/resources/application.yml` after the first runtime attempt failed on stale MySQL pool connections:
+  - `maximum-pool-size: 5`
+  - `minimum-idle: 1`
+  - `connection-timeout: 10000`
+  - `validation-timeout: 5000`
+  - `idle-timeout: 60000`
+  - `max-lifetime: 120000`
+  - `keepalive-time: 30000`
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Acceptance: aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry
+
+## Verification
+
+- [x] OpenSpec validates for `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`.
+- [x] Targeted AIOps service tests pass.
+- [x] Compile verification passes.
+- [x] Demo docs describe AIOps request -> session id -> trace query.
+
+## Result
+
+Accepted for implementation scope.
+
+## Known Limits
+
+- AIOps Verifier integration is deferred.
+- Runtime still depends on configured model and infrastructure.
+- Full browser/SSE runtime verification is not guaranteed in this coding pass.
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Brief: aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry
+
+## Background
+
+The MVP chat diagnosis path is now traceable through `diagnosis_session`, `agent_step`, `tool_invocation`, and `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace`. The older `/api/ai_ops` endpoint still acts like a standalone SSE demo: it accepts no alert payload, generates an internal session id, and does not make trace replay obvious to callers.
+
+## Goal
+
+Turn AIOps into an alert-triggered diagnosis entry point that shares the same evidence and trace story as the main MVP, without rewriting the whole AIOps flow.
+
+## Scope
+
+- In scope:
+  - Optional AIOps alert request body.
+  - Stable request/session id propagation.
+  - Persisted AIOps query summary and final answer.
+  - SSE session id event.
+  - Demo documentation and focused tests.
+- Out of scope:
+  - Full AIOps and ChatService unification.
+  - AIOps Verifier integration.
+  - Database schema changes.
+  - Sensitive configuration cleanup.
+  - Fully offline runtime.
+
+## Related OpenSpec
+
+`openspec/changes/aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry/`
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+# Decisions: aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry
+
+## Clarify
+
+- Entry summary: make the legacy AIOps SSE endpoint a traceable alert diagnosis entry for the Agent Engineer interview MVP.
+- Slug: `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`
+- Scale: standard-light, because this extends one public endpoint and reuses existing persistence/trace infrastructure.
+
+## Context
+
+- `mvp-demo-trace-acceptance` already added `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace`.
+- `chat-verifier-agent` made the chat path stronger than the older AIOps path.
+- Current AIOps value is as a second entry point: system alert -> automated diagnosis -> evidence trace.
+
+## Grill Question Pool
+
+| # | Dimension | Question | Mode | Status |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Q1 | Positioning | Is AIOps an independent product path or an alert-triggered sibling of Chat Diagnosis? | user-interview | Resolved: sibling entry, unified trace story |
+| Q2 | API | Should we keep `/api/ai_ops` or add a new endpoint? | evidence-driven | Resolved: keep existing endpoint and extend optional body |
+| Q3 | Input | What is the minimum alert payload? | user-interview | Resolved: `sessionId`, `alertName`, `service`, `severity`, `description`, `timeRange`, plus `userRequest` fallback |
+| Q4 | Output | How does the caller learn the trace session id? | evidence-driven | Resolved: first SSE event uses type `session` |
+| Q5 | Trace | Must AIOps be replayable with existing trace API? | evidence-driven | Resolved: yes, this is the main acceptance criterion |
+| Q6 | Verifier | Must this slice add AIOps Verifier? | user-interview | Resolved: no, defer as follow-up |
+| Q7 | Compatibility | Should no-body calls still work? | evidence-driven | Resolved: yes, preserve old demo behavior |
+| Q8 | GitNexus | Should unavailable GitNexus block implementation? | user-interview | Resolved: skip GitNexus by user decision |
+
+## Evidence-Driven Conclusions
+
+| Conclusion | Evidence Source | Result |
+|---|---|---|
+| AIOps is currently isolated from request-driven trace replay. | `ChatController.aiOps()` has no request body; `AiOpsService` creates its own random session id. | Extend endpoint and service. |
+| No schema change is needed. | `DiagnosisSession` already has `query`, `agentFlow`, `answer`, counts, and status. | Reuse existing table. |
+| Trace API can already replay AIOps if session id and answer are persisted. | `DiagnosisTraceService` loads by session id and is flow-agnostic. | Keep trace API unchanged. |
+| Blast radius is moderate and local. | `rg` shows only `ChatController` calls `executeAiOpsAnalysis` and `extractFinalReport`. | Change service/controller carefully and add tests. |
+
+## User-Interview Confirmations
+
+| Topic | User Words | Decision |
+|---|---|---|
+| Use sm-flow | "可以，改造一下AIOps 接口，用sm-flow流程看看" | Use OpenSpec + devflow. |
+| GitNexus | "跳过gitnexus把" | Record skip and use local impact analysis. |
+| Proceed after Grill | "可以" | Continue with lightweight Grill conclusions. |
+
+## Key Decisions
+
+- Keep `/api/ai_ops` and make its body optional.
+- Emit `SseMessage.type=session` before long-running analysis starts.
+- Store AIOps request summary in `diagnosis_session.query`.
+- Store final report in `diagnosis_session.answer`.
+- Defer AIOps Verifier to a later change so this slice stays focused.
+
+## Architecture Audit
+
+```text
+POST /api/ai_ops
+  -> optional AIOpsRequest
+  -> resolve sessionId
+  -> create diagnosis_session(agentFlow=AI_OPS)
+  -> run ai_ops_supervisor(planner, executor)
+  -> AgentLoggingHook persists steps
+  -> tools persist invocations under SessionContextHolder
+  -> extract final report
+  -> persist answer
+  -> GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace replays the run
+```
+
+Risk level: medium. The endpoint is public and SSE-based, but the change is additive and does not change the chat diagnosis path or database schema.
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Evidence: aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry
+
+## Local Impact Analysis
+
+- `ChatController.aiOps()` is the only caller of `AiOpsService.executeAiOpsAnalysis(...)`.
+- `ChatController.aiOps()` is the only caller of `AiOpsService.extractFinalReport(...)`.
+- `AIOpsRequest` exists but only has `userRequest`; no current controller consumes it.
+- `DiagnosisTraceService` is flow-agnostic and reads persisted session/step/tool records by `sessionId`.
+
+## GitNexus
+
+GitNexus MCP tools were not exposed in this session. The user explicitly approved skipping GitNexus for this change. Local impact analysis and targeted tests are used instead.
+
+## Expected Verification
+
+- Focused unit tests for AIOps request/session/report helper behavior.
+- Compile verification.
+- OpenSpec validation if CLI is available.
+
+## Verification Results
+
+- `openspec.cmd validate aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry --strict`: passed.
+- `mvn -q "-Dtest=AiOpsServiceTest,DiagnosisTraceServiceTest" test`: passed after rerun with approved Maven access.
+- `mvn -q -DskipTests compile`: passed.
+
+## Demo Alignment
+
+- Added `knowledge_base/troubleshooting/aiops-alert-runbook.md` so mock AIOps alerts have matching knowledge-base guidance.
+- Aligned the documented AIOps demo with mock data: `HighCPUUsage` on `payment-service`, using `system-metrics` evidence.
+
+## Metric Alignment Follow-up
+
+- Runtime verification showed `diagnosis_session.tool_call_count` counted agent steps with tool calls, while trace returned actual `tool_invocation` records.
+- Updated `ChatService` and `AiOpsService` metric backfill to use `ToolInvocationRepository.countBySessionId(sessionId)`.
+- Targeted verification:
+  - `mvn -q "-Dtest=AiOpsServiceTest,ChatServiceSequentialAgentTest,DiagnosisTraceServiceTest" test`: passed.
+  - `mvn -q -DskipTests compile`: passed.
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+---
+title: AIOps 告警排障 Runbook
+keywords: [AIOps, 告警, HighCPUUsage, SlowResponse, payment-service, system-metrics, application-logs]
+summary: 面向 AIOps 告警诊断的排障步骤，覆盖 Prometheus 活动告警、CLS 日志主题和处理建议。
+category: troubleshooting
+---
+
+# AIOps 告警排障 Runbook
+
+## 1. 告警输入处理原则
+
+AIOps 诊断入口有两种触发方式：
+
+- **有告警 payload**：将 payload 视为已触发告警，围绕 `alertName`、`service`、`severity`、`timeRange` 查询指标、日志和知识库。
+- **无告警 payload**：先调用 `queryPrometheusAlerts` 获取当前 firing 告警，再选择 P0/P1 或持续时间最长的告警进入诊断。
+
+最终报告必须基于工具证据，不得凭空编造指标、日志或处理结果。
+
+## 2. Mock 告警与日志主题映射
+
+| 告警名 | 典型服务 | 优先日志主题 | 推荐查询 |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| HighCPUUsage | payment-service | system-metrics | `cpu_usage:>80 AND service:payment-service` |
+| HighMemoryUsage | order-service | system-metrics, system-events | `memory_usage:>85` |
+| SlowResponse | user-service | application-logs, database-slow-query | `duration:>3000 OR slow request` |
+| ServiceUnavailable | 任意核心服务 | application-logs, system-events | `level:ERROR OR container crash` |
+
+## 3. HighCPUUsage / payment-service 排障步骤
+
+### 3.1 现象确认
+
+先确认 Prometheus 活动告警中是否存在：
+
+- `alert_name = HighCPUUsage`
+- `service = payment-service`
+- CPU 使用率超过 80%
+- 状态为 firing
+
+如果 payload 已经提供该告警，也仍需通过指标或日志工具验证。
+
+### 3.2 指标与日志取证
+
+推荐工具调用顺序：
+
+1. `queryPrometheusAlerts`：确认当前活动告警。
+2. `queryLogs(region=ap-guangzhou, logTopic=system-metrics, query=cpu_usage:>80 AND service:payment-service)`：确认 CPU 使用率、实例和持续时间。
+3. 如报告中提到 Redis、数据库或下游依赖，再查询 `application-logs` 或对应主题交叉验证。
+
+### 3.3 根因判断
+
+可接受的根因结论必须至少满足一项：
+
+- system-metrics 显示 payment-service 实例 CPU 使用率持续高于阈值。
+- application-logs 显示与 CPU 飙高同时出现的慢请求、线程池耗尽或依赖超时。
+- 告警持续时间与日志时间线一致。
+
+如果只有活动告警，没有日志或指标明细，应输出低置信结论并建议人工确认。
+
+## 4. 处理建议
+
+### 临时止血
+
+- 对 payment-service 做水平扩容，优先扩容受影响实例所在 Deployment。
+- 对高耗时接口开启限流或降级非核心功能。
+- 如果近期有发布，检查变更窗口并准备回滚。
+
+### 根因修复
+
+- 分析 CPU 热点线程、慢请求接口和依赖调用耗时。
+- 检查连接池、线程池、缓存穿透和批量任务是否导致 CPU 飙高。
+- 补充针对 `payment-service` 的 CPU、P95/P99 延迟、错误率和依赖超时联动告警。
+
+## 5. 报告要求
+
+告警分析报告至少包含：
+
+- 活跃告警清单。
+- 告警根因分析。
+- 使用过的工具证据：Prometheus 告警、system-metrics 日志、application-logs 或知识库。
+- 已执行或建议执行的处理方案。
+- 置信度说明：哪些结论有直接证据，哪些需要人工进一步确认。
@@ -78,6 +78,43 @@ Expected result:
 - `success` is `true`.
 - A later trace query shows `data.session.feedback` as `useful`.

+## 4. Run AIOps Alert Diagnosis
+
+```powershell
+$aiopsSessionId = "mvp-demo-aiops-payment-cpu-001"
+$aiopsBody = @{
+  sessionId = $aiopsSessionId
+  alertName = "HighCPUUsage"
+  service = "payment-service"
+  severity = "P1"
+  description = "服务 payment-service 的 CPU 使用率持续超过 80%，当前值为 92%。实例: pod-payment-service-7d8f9c6b5-x2k4m。"
+  timeRange = "last_15m"
+  userRequest = "请结合 Prometheus 活动告警、system-metrics 日志和知识库生成告警分析报告。"
+} | ConvertTo-Json
+
+Invoke-WebRequest `
+  -Method Post `
+  -Uri "http://localhost:9900/api/ai_ops" `
+  -ContentType "application/json" `
+  -Body $aiopsBody
+```
+
+Expected result:
+
+- The SSE stream starts with a `session` message containing `mvp-demo-aiops-payment-cpu-001`.
+- The stream later contains an AIOps alert analysis report focused on the supplied `HighCPUUsage/payment-service` payload.
+- A trace query for the same session id returns `data.session.agentFlow` as `AI_OPS`.
+- `data.session.answer` contains the final alert analysis report when a report is generated.
+- `data.toolInvocations` contains evidence tools such as `lookup_knowledge`, `query_logs`, or `query_metrics` when the runtime uses them.
+
+Query the AIOps trace:
+
+```powershell
+Invoke-RestMethod `
+  -Method Get `
+  -Uri "http://localhost:9900/api/diagnosis/$aiopsSessionId/trace"
+```
+
 ## Demo Story

 The important interview story is:
@@ -92,3 +129,14 @@ one session id
 -> feedback
 -> trace API for replay and audit
 ```
+
+The AIOps story uses the same audit spine:
+
+```text
+one session id
+-> alert payload
+-> AIOps planner/executor execution
+-> evidence tools
+-> alert analysis report
+-> trace API for replay and audit
+```
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+# AIOps Alert Acceptance Case
+
+## Goal
+
+Validate that the legacy AIOps endpoint can act as a traceable alert-triggered diagnosis entry.
+
+## Input
+
+- Session id: `mvp-demo-aiops-payment-cpu-001`
+- Endpoint: `POST /api/ai_ops`
+- Profile: `mvp-demo`
+- Alert:
+
+```json
+{
+  "sessionId": "mvp-demo-aiops-payment-cpu-001",
+  "alertName": "HighCPUUsage",
+  "service": "payment-service",
+  "severity": "P1",
+  "description": "服务 payment-service 的 CPU 使用率持续超过 80%，当前值为 92%。实例: pod-payment-service-7d8f9c6b5-x2k4m。",
+  "timeRange": "last_15m",
+  "userRequest": "请结合 Prometheus 活动告警、system-metrics 日志和知识库生成告警分析报告。"
+}
+```
+
+## Acceptance Criteria
+
+1. The SSE stream emits a `session` message containing the requested session id.
+2. The AIOps run creates or updates `diagnosis_session` with `agent_flow = AI_OPS`.
+3. The persisted session query contains the alert name, service, severity, time range, and description.
+4. If a final report is generated, `diagnosis_session.answer` contains that report.
+5. `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace` returns the AIOps session, ordered agent steps, and ordered tool invocations.
+6. In payload mode, the report focuses on `HighCPUUsage/payment-service`; unrelated active alerts may appear only as related risk or context, not as separate full root-cause sections.
+
+## Known Limits
+
+- This slice does not add a Verifier Agent to AIOps.
+- Full runtime verification still depends on valid DB, Redis, Milvus/Zilliz, model, and embedding configuration.
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+schema: spec-driven
+created: 2026-07-04
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+## Context
+
+The AIOps endpoint has two natural modes:
+
+- **Payload mode**: caller supplies `alertName`, `service`, or other alert fields. The caller is asking for targeted diagnosis of that alert.
+- **Auto-discovery mode**: caller omits alert fields. The system should discover active alerts first, then analyze them.
+
+The current task prompt does not distinguish these modes, so the agent may query all active alerts and produce a broad report even when a specific alert payload was supplied.
+
+## Goals / Non-Goals
+
+**Goals:**
+
+- Make AIOps payload mode single-alert focused.
+- Keep no-payload mode compatible with the original "query active alerts then diagnose" behavior.
+- Keep the change prompt-only and low risk.
+- Add tests for prompt scope rules.
+
+**Non-Goals:**
+
+- Do not add a Verifier Agent.
+- Do not force tool calls in Java code.
+- Do not change `/api/ai_ops` request/response contracts.
+- Do not modify mock alert data.
+
+## Decisions
+
+| Decision | Choice | Alternative Considered | Rationale |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Scope detection | Treat non-empty alert fields as payload mode | Add explicit `mode` field | Existing payload already carries enough intent; no API change needed. |
+| Payload mode behavior | Final report focuses only on supplied alert | Filter tool results in Java | Prompt-level rule is the smallest change and preserves agent flexibility. |
+| Auto mode behavior | Require active-alert discovery first | Always analyze only one alert | Original AIOps value is automated alert discovery when no payload exists. |
+| Other active alerts in payload mode | Mention only as related risk | Ignore entirely | Some context can be useful, but not enough to expand the report. |
+
+## Prompt Rules
+
+Payload mode MUST instruct the agent:
+
+- Treat supplied payload as the primary and only report target.
+- Use `queryPrometheusAlerts` only to verify the supplied alert state or identify related risk.
+- Do not create root-cause sections for unrelated active alerts.
+- Report unrelated alerts only in a brief "关联风险" note if they appear relevant.
+
+Auto-discovery mode MUST instruct the agent:
+
+- First call `queryPrometheusAlerts`.
+- Select P0/P1 or longest-running firing alerts.
+- Analyze one or more active alerts based on severity and evidence.
+
+## Risks / Trade-offs
+
+- [Risk] Prompt-only control may not be perfectly followed by the LLM. -> Mitigation: tests lock prompt wording; runtime can be reviewed through trace.
+- [Risk] Payload mode may miss broader incidents. -> Mitigation: related active alerts may be mentioned as risk, but not expanded into full sections.
+- [Risk] Future stronger enforcement may be needed. -> Mitigation: a later change can filter tool summaries or add AIOps Verifier.
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## Why
+
+Runtime verification showed that AIOps now correctly accepts an alert payload and persists a trace, but the generated report still expands to every active mock Prometheus alert. That weakens the product boundary between `/api/chat` and `/api/ai_ops`: an alert payload should mean targeted alert diagnosis, while an empty payload should mean automatic active-alert discovery.
+
+## What Changes
+
+- Tighten the AIOps task prompt so payload mode focuses the final report on the supplied alert.
+- Preserve full active-alert discovery when no payload is supplied.
+- Allow Prometheus active-alert lookup in payload mode only as supporting evidence, not as permission to expand the report to unrelated alerts.
+- Update tests and demo acceptance wording to lock the new behavior.
+
+## Capabilities
+
+### New Capabilities
+
+- `aiops-alert-scope-control`: Defines AIOps diagnosis scope rules for payload mode versus auto-discovery mode.
+
+### Modified Capabilities
+
+- `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`: Keeps the same API and trace behavior but clarifies how AIOps should scope its diagnosis.
+
+## Impact
+
+- Affected code: `AiOpsService.buildTaskPrompt(...)`, focused tests, demo documentation, devflow records.
+- Affected API: no endpoint or request/response shape change.
+- Affected persistence: no schema change.
+- Non-goals: no Verifier integration, no tool implementation change, no prompt rewrite for Chat.
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## ADDED Requirements
+
+### Requirement: AIOps payload mode focuses on supplied alert
+When an AIOps request includes alert payload fields, the system SHALL instruct the agent to focus the final alert analysis report on the supplied alert.
+
+#### Scenario: Request includes alertName and service
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` with `alertName` and `service`
+- **THEN** the AIOps task prompt identifies payload mode
+- **AND** the prompt instructs the agent not to create full root-cause sections for unrelated active alerts
+
+### Requirement: AIOps auto-discovery mode queries active alerts first
+When an AIOps request omits alert payload fields, the system SHALL instruct the agent to first discover active Prometheus alerts.
+
+#### Scenario: Request body is omitted
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` without alert fields
+- **THEN** the AIOps task prompt identifies auto-discovery mode
+- **AND** the prompt instructs the agent to call `queryPrometheusAlerts` first
+
+### Requirement: Payload mode may use active alerts as supporting context
+Payload mode SHALL allow active-alert lookup as supporting evidence, but SHALL keep unrelated alerts out of the main report sections.
+
+#### Scenario: Prometheus returns multiple active alerts
+- **WHEN** payload mode is active and `queryPrometheusAlerts` returns unrelated active alerts
+- **THEN** the prompt permits mentioning those alerts only as related risk or context
+- **AND** the final report target remains the supplied alert
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+## 1. Flow Records
+
+- [x] 1.1 Add devflow brief, decisions with lightweight Grill, evidence, and acceptance records.
+- [x] 1.2 Record local impact analysis and GitNexus skip context.
+
+## 2. Prompt Scope Control
+
+- [x] 2.1 Add payload detection helper in `AiOpsService`.
+- [x] 2.2 Update `buildTaskPrompt(...)` with payload-mode and auto-discovery-mode rules.
+
+## 3. Tests And Docs
+
+- [x] 3.1 Add tests for payload-mode prompt rules.
+- [x] 3.2 Add tests for no-payload auto-discovery prompt rules.
+- [x] 3.3 Update AIOps demo acceptance wording for single-alert payload mode.
+
+## 4. Verification
+
+- [x] 4.1 Run targeted tests.
+- [x] 4.2 Run compile verification.
+- [x] 4.3 Run OpenSpec validation.
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+schema: spec-driven
+created: 2026-07-04
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+## Context
+
+The AIOps endpoint is currently useful as a standalone alert-analysis demo, but it is not aligned with the MVP trace story:
+
+- `ChatController.aiOps()` accepts no request body.
+- `AiOpsService.executeAiOpsAnalysis(...)` creates a random 8-character session id internally.
+- The caller cannot reliably discover that id and query `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace`.
+- `extractFinalReport(...)` returns the report text but does not persist it to `diagnosis_session.answer`.
+
+The existing trace API already aggregates `diagnosis_session`, `agent_step`, and `tool_invocation`, so this change should reuse that storage rather than introduce new persistence.
+
+## Goals / Non-Goals
+
+**Goals:**
+
+- Make `/api/ai_ops` usable as an alert-triggered diagnosis entry point.
+- Preserve backward compatibility for callers that post with no request body.
+- Return the resolved `sessionId` through SSE.
+- Persist the final report into the existing diagnosis session.
+- Keep the AIOps path observable through the existing trace API.
+
+**Non-Goals:**
+
+- Do not merge AIOps into `ChatService`.
+- Do not add a new Verifier Agent to AIOps in this slice.
+- Do not change `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace`.
+- Do not add database migrations.
+- Do not clean up sensitive configuration.
+
+## Decisions
+
+| Decision | Choice | Alternative Considered | Rationale |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| API compatibility | Keep `POST /api/ai_ops` SSE and make body optional | Add a new `/api/ai_ops/v2` endpoint | Optional body keeps existing demo callers working while enabling traceable alert input. |
+| Session identity | Accept request `sessionId`, otherwise generate UUID | Continue internal-only 8-char id | Reviewers need the id to query trace and submit feedback. |
+| Query persistence | Build a concise alert diagnosis query from request fields | Store only "AI Ops 告警分析" | Trace should show what alert was diagnosed. |
+| Final answer persistence | Save extracted final report to `diagnosis_session.answer` | Only stream the report | Trace replay must include the final answer without relying on SSE logs. |
+| Verifier scope | Defer AIOps Verifier integration | Add Chat Verifier now | The minimum interview value is traceability; Verifier unification can be a follow-up after this entry point is stable. |
+| GitNexus | Skip by user decision | Block until MCP available | GitNexus tools are not exposed in this session, and the user explicitly requested skipping GitNexus. Local impact analysis and tests cover this slice. |
+
+## Interface Impact
+
+- Level: L3 API behavior extension.
+- Endpoint: `POST /api/ai_ops`
+- Compatibility: callers may still omit a body. New callers may send:
+
+```json
+{
+  "sessionId": "mvp-demo-aiops-payment-latency-001",
+  "alertName": "payment-service-latency-high",
+  "service": "payment-service",
+  "severity": "P1",
+  "description": "支付服务 P95 延迟升高并伴随超时错误",
+  "timeRange": "last_15m"
+}
+```
+
+The SSE stream emits a first content message containing the resolved session id:
+
+```text
+sessionId: mvp-demo-aiops-payment-latency-001
+```
+
+## Data Flow
+
+```text
+POST /api/ai_ops
+  -> ChatController resolves request body and tools
+  -> AiOpsService.executeAiOpsAnalysis(chatModel, tools, request)
+  -> create diagnosis_session(agentFlow=AI_OPS, query=<alert summary>)
+  -> set SessionContextHolder(sessionId)
+  -> ai_ops_supervisor -> planner_agent -> executor_agent
+  -> persist agent_step and tool_invocation through existing hooks/tools
+  -> extract final report
+  -> persist diagnosis_session.answer/status/counts
+  -> caller queries GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace
+```
+
+## Risks / Trade-offs
+
+- [Risk] AIOps still lacks the Chat Verifier quality gate. -> Mitigation: document as follow-up and keep this slice focused on traceability.
+- [Risk] SSE clients may not parse the new first message. -> Mitigation: message is additive content; existing clients still receive the final report.
+- [Risk] Optional request body in Spring MVC can be easy to mishandle. -> Mitigation: use `@RequestBody(required = false)` and default request values in service code.
+- [Risk] AIOps generated reports may still depend on real infrastructure. -> Mitigation: demo profile already enables mock logs/metrics where available; full offline mode remains out of scope.
+
+## Migration Plan
+
+- No database migration.
+- Deploy with application restart.
+- Rollback by reverting controller/service/DTO changes; existing persisted sessions remain valid.
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+## Why
+
+The MVP already has a strong traceable chat diagnosis path, but the legacy `/api/ai_ops` endpoint still behaves like an early standalone demo: it accepts no alert payload, generates an internal session id that callers cannot reuse, and streams a report without reliably persisting the final answer for trace replay. For an Agent Engineer interview project, AIOps should become a second entry point into the same observable diagnosis story rather than a disconnected legacy path.
+
+## What Changes
+
+- Allow `/api/ai_ops` to accept an optional alert diagnosis request body.
+- Resolve a stable session id from the request or generate one when omitted.
+- Persist the AIOps alert query and final report into `diagnosis_session`.
+- Emit the resolved session id in the SSE stream so reviewers can call `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace`.
+- Keep the existing AIOps planner/executor flow and evidence tools; do not replace it with the chat flow in this slice.
+- Document the AIOps demo path beside the existing MVP demo trace flow.
+
+## Capabilities
+
+### New Capabilities
+
+- `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`: Makes the AIOps alert endpoint traceable by session id and replayable through the existing diagnosis trace API.
+
+### Modified Capabilities
+
+- Existing `/api/ai_ops` behavior is extended from a no-input SSE trigger into an optional request-body alert diagnosis endpoint.
+
+## Impact
+
+- Affected code: `ChatController`, `AiOpsService`, `AIOpsRequest`, focused tests, MVP demo documentation, devflow records.
+- Affected API: `POST /api/ai_ops` remains SSE, but now accepts an optional JSON body and streams a first message containing `sessionId`.
+- Affected persistence: no schema migration; writes existing `diagnosis_session.query`, `answer`, `status`, timing, and aggregate counts.
+- Non-goals: no full AIOps/Chat service unification, no new database table, no production security cleanup, no full offline fake runtime, no mandatory Verifier integration for AIOps in this slice.
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+## ADDED Requirements
+
+### Requirement: AIOps endpoint accepts optional alert input
+The system SHALL allow `POST /api/ai_ops` to accept an optional JSON request body describing the alert diagnosis request.
+
+#### Scenario: Caller supplies alert input
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` with alert fields such as session id, alert name, service, severity, description, and time range
+- **THEN** the AIOps analysis uses those fields to build the diagnosis task prompt and persisted session query
+
+#### Scenario: Caller omits alert input
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` without a body
+- **THEN** the system still starts the default AIOps alert-analysis flow
+
+### Requirement: AIOps session id is traceable
+The system SHALL resolve a stable AIOps session id from the request when provided, otherwise generate one, and SHALL expose that session id to the SSE caller.
+
+#### Scenario: Request includes session id
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` with `sessionId`
+- **THEN** the created `diagnosis_session.session_id` equals that value
+- **AND** the SSE stream includes the same session id
+
+#### Scenario: Request omits session id
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` without `sessionId`
+- **THEN** the system generates a session id
+- **AND** the SSE stream includes the generated session id
+
+### Requirement: AIOps report is persisted for trace replay
+The system SHALL persist the final AIOps report into the existing `diagnosis_session.answer` field when a report is available.
+
+#### Scenario: AIOps report is generated
+- **WHEN** the AIOps planner/executor flow returns a final report
+- **THEN** the corresponding diagnosis session is marked successful
+- **AND** `diagnosis_session.answer` stores the final report
+- **AND** `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace` can include that answer
+
+### Requirement: AIOps trace uses existing evidence tables
+The system SHALL continue using existing `agent_step` and `tool_invocation` persistence for AIOps trace evidence.
+
+#### Scenario: AIOps uses evidence tools
+- **WHEN** the AIOps flow calls available evidence tools
+- **THEN** existing hooks and recorders persist agent steps and tool invocations under the resolved AIOps session id
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+## 1. Flow Records
+
+- [x] 1.1 Add devflow brief, decisions, evidence, and acceptance records for `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`.
+- [x] 1.2 Record user-approved GitNexus skip and local impact analysis.
+
+## 2. AIOps API And Service
+
+- [x] 2.1 Extend `AIOpsRequest` with optional session id and alert fields.
+- [x] 2.2 Change `/api/ai_ops` to accept an optional request body and emit the resolved session id in SSE.
+- [x] 2.3 Change `AiOpsService` to accept the request, resolve session id, build a request-specific prompt, and persist the request summary.
+- [x] 2.4 Persist the final AIOps report to `diagnosis_session.answer`.
+
+## 3. Demo Documentation
+
+- [x] 3.1 Add an AIOps alert demo section to `mvp/demo/README.md`.
+- [x] 3.2 Add a concrete AIOps acceptance case under `mvp/demo`.
+
+## 4. Verification
+
+- [x] 4.1 Add focused unit coverage for AIOps request/session/report persistence behavior where practical.
+- [x] 4.2 Run targeted tests.
+- [x] 4.3 Run compile verification.
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# aiops-alert-scope-control Specification
+
+## Purpose
+TBD - created by archiving change aiops-alert-scope-control. Update Purpose after archive.
+## Requirements
+### Requirement: AIOps payload mode focuses on supplied alert
+When an AIOps request includes alert payload fields, the system SHALL instruct the agent to focus the final alert analysis report on the supplied alert.
+
+#### Scenario: Request includes alertName and service
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` with `alertName` and `service`
+- **THEN** the AIOps task prompt identifies payload mode
+- **AND** the prompt instructs the agent not to create full root-cause sections for unrelated active alerts
+
+### Requirement: AIOps auto-discovery mode queries active alerts first
+When an AIOps request omits alert payload fields, the system SHALL instruct the agent to first discover active Prometheus alerts.
+
+#### Scenario: Request body is omitted
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` without alert fields
+- **THEN** the AIOps task prompt identifies auto-discovery mode
+- **AND** the prompt instructs the agent to call `queryPrometheusAlerts` first
+
+### Requirement: Payload mode may use active alerts as supporting context
+Payload mode SHALL allow active-alert lookup as supporting evidence, but SHALL keep unrelated alerts out of the main report sections.
+
+#### Scenario: Prometheus returns multiple active alerts
+- **WHEN** payload mode is active and `queryPrometheusAlerts` returns unrelated active alerts
+- **THEN** the prompt permits mentioning those alerts only as related risk or context
+- **AND** the final report target remains the supplied alert
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry Specification
+
+## Purpose
+TBD - created by archiving change aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry. Update Purpose after archive.
+## Requirements
+### Requirement: AIOps endpoint accepts optional alert input
+The system SHALL allow `POST /api/ai_ops` to accept an optional JSON request body describing the alert diagnosis request.
+
+#### Scenario: Caller supplies alert input
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` with alert fields such as session id, alert name, service, severity, description, and time range
+- **THEN** the AIOps analysis uses those fields to build the diagnosis task prompt and persisted session query
+
+#### Scenario: Caller omits alert input
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` without a body
+- **THEN** the system still starts the default AIOps alert-analysis flow
+
+### Requirement: AIOps session id is traceable
+The system SHALL resolve a stable AIOps session id from the request when provided, otherwise generate one, and SHALL expose that session id to the SSE caller.
+
+#### Scenario: Request includes session id
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` with `sessionId`
+- **THEN** the created `diagnosis_session.session_id` equals that value
+- **AND** the SSE stream includes the same session id
+
+#### Scenario: Request omits session id
+- **WHEN** a caller posts to `/api/ai_ops` without `sessionId`
+- **THEN** the system generates a session id
+- **AND** the SSE stream includes the generated session id
+
+### Requirement: AIOps report is persisted for trace replay
+The system SHALL persist the final AIOps report into the existing `diagnosis_session.answer` field when a report is available.
+
+#### Scenario: AIOps report is generated
+- **WHEN** the AIOps planner/executor flow returns a final report
+- **THEN** the corresponding diagnosis session is marked successful
+- **AND** `diagnosis_session.answer` stores the final report
+- **AND** `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace` can include that answer
+
+### Requirement: AIOps trace uses existing evidence tables
+The system SHALL continue using existing `agent_step` and `tool_invocation` persistence for AIOps trace evidence.
+
+#### Scenario: AIOps uses evidence tools
+- **WHEN** the AIOps flow calls available evidence tools
+- **THEN** existing hooks and recorders persist agent steps and tool invocations under the resolved AIOps session id
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import com.alibaba.cloud.ai.graph.OverAllState;
 import lombok.Getter;
 import lombok.Setter;
 import com.superbiz.agent.domain.model.SessionContext;
+import com.superbiz.agent.dto.AIOpsRequest;
 import com.superbiz.agent.service.AiOpsService;
 import com.superbiz.agent.service.ChatService;
 import com.superbiz.agent.service.session.SessionManager;
@@ -212,21 +213,23 @@ public class ChatController {
     * 无需用户输入，自动执行告警分析流程
     */
    @PostMapping(value = "/ai_ops", produces = "text/event-stream;charset=UTF-8")
-    public SseEmitter aiOps() {
+    public SseEmitter aiOps(@RequestBody(required = false) AIOpsRequest request) {
        SseEmitter emitter = new SseEmitter(600000L); // 10分钟超时（告警分析可能较慢）
+        String sessionId = aiOpsService.resolveSessionId(request);

        executor.execute(() -> {
            try {
-                logger.info("收到 AI 智能运维请求 - 启动多 Agent 协作流程");
+                logger.info("收到 AI 智能运维请求 - SessionId: {}, 启动多 Agent 协作流程", sessionId);

                ChatModel chatModel = chatService.getChatModel();

                ToolCallback[] toolCallbacks = tools != null ? tools.getToolCallbacks() : new ToolCallback[0];

+                emitter.send(SseEmitter.event().name("message").data(SseMessage.session(sessionId), MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON));
                emitter.send(SseEmitter.event().name("message").data(SseMessage.content("正在读取告警并拆解任务...\n")));
                
                // 调用 AiOpsService 执行分析流程
-                Optional<OverAllState> overAllStateOptional = aiOpsService.executeAiOpsAnalysis(chatModel, toolCallbacks);
+                Optional<OverAllState> overAllStateOptional = aiOpsService.executeAiOpsAnalysis(chatModel, toolCallbacks, request, sessionId);

                if (overAllStateOptional.isEmpty()) {
                    emitter.send(SseEmitter.event().name("message")
@@ -245,6 +248,7 @@ public class ChatController {
                if (finalReportOptional.isPresent()) {
                    String finalReportText = finalReportOptional.get();
                    logger.info("提取到 Planner 最终报告，长度: {}", finalReportText.length());
+                    aiOpsService.persistFinalReport(sessionId, finalReportText);
                    
                    // 发送分隔线
                    emitter.send(SseEmitter.event().name("message")
@@ -443,6 +447,13 @@ public class ChatController {
            return message;
        }

+        public static SseMessage session(String sessionId) {
+            SseMessage message = new SseMessage();
+            message.setType("session");
+            message.setData(sessionId);
+            return message;
+        }
+
        public static SseMessage error(String errorMessage) {
            SseMessage message = new SseMessage();
            message.setType("error");
@@ -7,6 +7,36 @@ import lombok.Data;
 */
@Data
 public class AIOpsRequest {
+
+    /**
+     * 诊断会话 ID；为空时后端自动生成。
+     */
+    private String sessionId;
+
+    /**
+     * 告警名称。
+     */
+    private String alertName;
+
+    /**
+     * 受影响服务。
+     */
+    private String service;
+
+    /**
+     * 告警等级，例如 P0/P1/P2。
+     */
+    private String severity;
+
+    /**
+     * 告警描述。
+     */
+    private String description;
+
+    /**
+     * 排查时间范围，例如 last_15m。
+     */
+    private String timeRange;
    
    /**
     * 用户请求描述
@@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ public interface ToolInvocationRepository extends JpaRepository<ToolInvocation,
     */
    List<ToolInvocation> findBySessionIdOrderByIdAsc(String sessionId);

+    /**
+     * 根据会话ID统计真实工具调用次数
+     */
+    long countBySessionId(String sessionId);
+
    /**
     * 根据工具名查询所有调用
     */
@@ -10,11 +10,12 @@ import com.superbiz.agent.agent.tool.InternalDocsTools;
 import com.superbiz.agent.agent.tool.QueryLogsTools;
 import com.superbiz.agent.agent.tool.QueryMetricsTools;
 import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.AgentStep;
-import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.AgentStep;
 import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.DiagnosisSession;
+import com.superbiz.agent.dto.AIOpsRequest;
 import com.superbiz.agent.hook.AgentLoggingHook;
 import com.superbiz.agent.repository.AgentStepRepository;
 import com.superbiz.agent.repository.DiagnosisSessionRepository;
+import com.superbiz.agent.repository.ToolInvocationRepository;
 import com.superbiz.agent.util.SessionContextHolder;
 import org.slf4j.Logger;
 import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
@@ -62,6 +63,9 @@ public class AiOpsService {
    @Autowired
    private AgentStepRepository agentStepRepository;

+    @Autowired
+    private ToolInvocationRepository toolInvocationRepository;
+
    /**
     * 执行 AI Ops 告警分析流程
     *
@@ -71,22 +75,22 @@ public class AiOpsService {
     * @throws GraphRunnerException 如果 Agent 执行失败
     */
    public Optional<OverAllState> executeAiOpsAnalysis(ChatModel chatModel, ToolCallback[] toolCallbacks) throws GraphRunnerException {
+        return executeAiOpsAnalysis(chatModel, toolCallbacks, null, resolveSessionId(null));
+    }
+
+    public Optional<OverAllState> executeAiOpsAnalysis(ChatModel chatModel, ToolCallback[] toolCallbacks,
+                                                       AIOpsRequest request, String sessionId) throws GraphRunnerException {
        logger.info("开始执行 AI Ops 多 Agent 协作流程");

-        String sessionId = UUID.randomUUID().toString().substring(0, 8);
+        String resolvedSessionId = isBlank(sessionId) ? resolveSessionId(request) : sessionId.trim();
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();

-        // 创建诊断会话
-        DiagnosisSession session = DiagnosisSession.builder()
-                .sessionId(sessionId)
-                .query("AI Ops 告警分析")
-                .status("RUNNING")
-                .agentFlow("AI_OPS")
-                .build();
+        // 创建或更新诊断会话
+        DiagnosisSession session = startDiagnosisSession(resolvedSessionId, request);
        diagnosisSessionRepository.save(session);

        // 设置 ThreadLocal 上下文（LookupKnowledgeTool 通过此获取 sessionId）
-        SessionContextHolder.setSessionId(sessionId);
+        SessionContextHolder.setSessionId(resolvedSessionId);

        try {
            // 构建 Planner 和 Executor Agent（每个 Agent 各自带 Hook）
@@ -102,7 +106,7 @@ public class AiOpsService {
                    .subAgents(List.of(plannerAgent, executorAgent))
                    .build();

-            String taskPrompt = "你是企业级 SRE，接到了自动化告警排查任务。请结合工具调用，执行**规划→执行→再规划**的闭环，并最终按照固定模板输出《告警分析报告》。禁止编造虚假数据，如连续多次查询失败需诚实反馈无法完成的原因。";
+            String taskPrompt = buildTaskPrompt(request);

            logger.info("调用 Supervisor Agent 开始编排...");

@@ -158,6 +162,87 @@ public class AiOpsService {
        }
    }

+    public String resolveSessionId(AIOpsRequest request) {
+        if (request != null && !isBlank(request.getSessionId())) {
+            return request.getSessionId().trim();
+        }
+        return UUID.randomUUID().toString();
+    }
+
+    public void persistFinalReport(String sessionId, String finalReport) {
+        if (isBlank(sessionId) || isBlank(finalReport)) {
+            return;
+        }
+        diagnosisSessionRepository.findBySessionId(sessionId.trim()).ifPresent(session -> {
+            session.setAnswer(finalReport);
+            diagnosisSessionRepository.save(session);
+        });
+    }
+
+    String buildQuerySummary(AIOpsRequest request) {
+        if (request == null) {
+            return "AI Ops 告警分析";
+        }
+
+        StringBuilder summary = new StringBuilder("AI Ops 告警分析");
+        appendField(summary, "告警", request.getAlertName());
+        appendField(summary, "服务", request.getService());
+        appendField(summary, "等级", request.getSeverity());
+        appendField(summary, "时间范围", request.getTimeRange());
+        appendField(summary, "描述", request.getDescription());
+        appendField(summary, "请求", request.getUserRequest());
+        return summary.toString();
+    }
+
+    boolean hasAlertPayload(AIOpsRequest request) {
+        if (request == null) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        return !isBlank(request.getAlertName())
+                || !isBlank(request.getService())
+                || !isBlank(request.getSeverity())
+                || !isBlank(request.getDescription())
+                || !isBlank(request.getTimeRange());
+    }
+
+    String buildTaskPrompt(AIOpsRequest request) {
+        StringBuilder prompt = new StringBuilder();
+        prompt.append("你是企业级 SRE，接到了自动化告警排查任务。请结合工具调用，执行**规划→执行→再规划**的闭环，并最终按照固定模板输出《告警分析报告》。禁止编造虚假数据，如连续多次查询失败需诚实反馈无法完成的原因。");
+        prompt.append("\n\n本次告警输入：\n");
+        prompt.append(buildQuerySummary(request));
+        if (hasAlertPayload(request)) {
+            prompt.append("\n\nAIOps scope mode: PAYLOAD_TARGETED\n");
+            prompt.append("- The request includes an alert payload. Treat the supplied alert payload as the primary and only main diagnosis target.\n");
+            prompt.append("- The final report must focus on the supplied alert fields such as alertName, service, severity, description, and timeRange.\n");
+            prompt.append("- You may call queryPrometheusAlerts only to verify whether the supplied alert is still active or to identify related risk/context.\n");
+            prompt.append("- If queryPrometheusAlerts returns unrelated active alerts, do not create full root-cause or remediation sections for them.\n");
+            prompt.append("- Mention unrelated active alerts only briefly in a Related Risk section when they help explain the supplied alert.\n");
+        } else {
+            prompt.append("\n\nAIOps scope mode: AUTO_DISCOVERY\n");
+            prompt.append("- The request does not include alert payload fields. First call queryPrometheusAlerts to discover current active/firing alerts.\n");
+            prompt.append("- Prefer P0/P1 alerts or the longest-running firing alerts, then diagnose one or more alerts based on severity and evidence.\n");
+            prompt.append("- Use metrics, logs, and knowledge-base evidence before producing the final alert analysis report.\n");
+        }
+        return prompt.toString();
+    }
+
+    private DiagnosisSession startDiagnosisSession(String sessionId, AIOpsRequest request) {
+        DiagnosisSession session = diagnosisSessionRepository.findBySessionId(sessionId)
+                .orElseGet(() -> DiagnosisSession.builder()
+                        .sessionId(sessionId)
+                        .agentFlow("AI_OPS")
+                        .build());
+        session.setQuery(buildQuerySummary(request));
+        session.setStatus("RUNNING");
+        session.setAgentFlow("AI_OPS");
+        session.setAnswer(null);
+        session.setTotalDurationMs(null);
+        session.setTotalTokenCount(null);
+        session.setStepCount(null);
+        session.setToolCallCount(null);
+        return session;
+    }
+
    /**
     * 构建 Planner Agent
     */
@@ -205,25 +290,33 @@ public class AiOpsService {
        }
    }

-    /** 从 agent_step 汇总指标回填 diagnosis_session */
+    /** 从 agent_step 和 tool_invocation 汇总指标回填 diagnosis_session */
    private void backfillSessionMetrics(DiagnosisSession session) {
        try {
            List<AgentStep> steps = agentStepRepository.findBySessionIdOrderByStepIndex(session.getSessionId());
-            if (steps.isEmpty()) return;

            int totalTokens = 0;
            int stepCount = 0;
-            int toolCallCount = 0;
            for (AgentStep s : steps) {
                stepCount++;
                if (s.getTokenCount() != null) totalTokens += s.getTokenCount();
-                if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(s.getHasToolCall())) toolCallCount++;
            }
+            long toolCallCount = toolInvocationRepository.countBySessionId(session.getSessionId());
            session.setTotalTokenCount(totalTokens);
            session.setStepCount(stepCount);
-            session.setToolCallCount(toolCallCount);
+            session.setToolCallCount(Math.toIntExact(toolCallCount));
        } catch (Exception e) {
            logger.warn("回填会话指标失败: sessionId={}", session.getSessionId(), e);
        }
    }
+
+    private void appendField(StringBuilder builder, String label, String value) {
+        if (!isBlank(value)) {
+            builder.append("\n- ").append(label).append(": ").append(value.trim());
+        }
+    }
+
+    private boolean isBlank(String value) {
+        return value == null || value.trim().isEmpty();
+    }
 }
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ import com.superbiz.agent.hook.TokenUsageHolder;
 import com.superbiz.agent.hook.VerifierInputHook;
 import com.superbiz.agent.repository.AgentStepRepository;
 import com.superbiz.agent.repository.DiagnosisSessionRepository;
+import com.superbiz.agent.repository.ToolInvocationRepository;
 import com.superbiz.agent.tool.LookupKnowledgeTool;
 import com.superbiz.agent.tool.RetrievedDocTracker;
 import com.superbiz.agent.util.QuestionComplexity;
@@ -86,6 +87,9 @@ public class ChatService {
    @Autowired
    private AgentStepRepository agentStepRepository;

+    @Autowired
+    private ToolInvocationRepository toolInvocationRepository;
+
    @Autowired
    private EvaluationService evaluationService;

@@ -838,25 +842,22 @@ public class ChatService {
    ) {
    }

-    /** 从 agent_step 汇总 token、步数等指标回填 diagnosis_session */
+    /** 从 agent_step 和 tool_invocation 汇总指标回填 diagnosis_session */
    private void backfillSessionMetrics(DiagnosisSession session) {
        try {
            List<com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.AgentStep> steps =
                agentStepRepository.findBySessionIdOrderByStepIndex(session.getSessionId());

-            if (steps.isEmpty()) return;
-
            int totalTokens = 0;
            int stepCount = 0;
-            int toolCallCount = 0;
            for (var s : steps) {
                stepCount++;
                if (s.getTokenCount() != null) totalTokens += s.getTokenCount();
-                if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(s.getHasToolCall())) toolCallCount++;
            }
+            long toolCallCount = toolInvocationRepository.countBySessionId(session.getSessionId());
            session.setTotalTokenCount(totalTokens);
            session.setStepCount(stepCount);
-            session.setToolCallCount(toolCallCount);
+            session.setToolCallCount(Math.toIntExact(toolCallCount));
        } catch (Exception e) {
            logger.warn("回填会话指标失败: sessionId={}", session.getSessionId(), e);
        }
@@ -47,6 +47,14 @@ spring:
    username: root
    password: '!Fucker123..'
    driver-class-name: com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver
+    hikari:
+      maximum-pool-size: 5
+      minimum-idle: 1
+      connection-timeout: 10000
+      validation-timeout: 5000
+      idle-timeout: 60000
+      max-lifetime: 120000
+      keepalive-time: 30000

  # =====================================================
  # JPA 配置
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+package com.superbiz.agent.service;
+
+import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.AgentStep;
+import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.DiagnosisSession;
+import com.superbiz.agent.dto.AIOpsRequest;
+import com.superbiz.agent.repository.AgentStepRepository;
+import com.superbiz.agent.repository.DiagnosisSessionRepository;
+import com.superbiz.agent.repository.ToolInvocationRepository;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
+import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
+import org.springframework.test.util.ReflectionTestUtils;
+
+import java.util.Optional;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
+
+class AiOpsServiceTest {
+
+    private final DiagnosisSessionRepository diagnosisSessionRepository = mock(DiagnosisSessionRepository.class);
+    private final AgentStepRepository agentStepRepository = mock(AgentStepRepository.class);
+    private final ToolInvocationRepository toolInvocationRepository = mock(ToolInvocationRepository.class);
+    private final AiOpsService service = new AiOpsService();
+
+    @BeforeEach
+    void setUp() {
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(service, "diagnosisSessionRepository", diagnosisSessionRepository);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(service, "agentStepRepository", agentStepRepository);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(service, "toolInvocationRepository", toolInvocationRepository);
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void resolveSessionIdUsesRequestValueWhenPresent() {
+        AIOpsRequest request = new AIOpsRequest();
+        request.setSessionId(" aiops-demo-session ");
+
+        assertEquals("aiops-demo-session", service.resolveSessionId(request));
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void resolveSessionIdGeneratesWhenMissing() {
+        String sessionId = service.resolveSessionId(null);
+
+        assertNotNull(sessionId);
+        assertFalse(sessionId.isBlank());
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void buildQuerySummaryUsesAlertFieldsAndUserRequestFallback() {
+        AIOpsRequest request = new AIOpsRequest();
+        request.setAlertName("payment-service-latency-high");
+        request.setService("payment-service");
+        request.setSeverity("P1");
+        request.setTimeRange("last_15m");
+        request.setDescription("P95 latency is high");
+        request.setUserRequest("结合日志和指标排查支付超时");
+
+        String summary = service.buildQuerySummary(request);
+
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("AI Ops 告警分析"));
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("告警: payment-service-latency-high"));
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("服务: payment-service"));
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("等级: P1"));
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("时间范围: last_15m"));
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("描述: P95 latency is high"));
+        assertTrue(summary.contains("请求: 结合日志和指标排查支付超时"));
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void hasAlertPayloadIgnoresUserRequestOnly() {
+        AIOpsRequest request = new AIOpsRequest();
+        request.setUserRequest("please discover active alerts");
+
+        assertFalse(service.hasAlertPayload(request));
+
+        request.setAlertName("HighCPUUsage");
+
+        assertTrue(service.hasAlertPayload(request));
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void buildTaskPromptUsesPayloadTargetedModeWhenAlertFieldsExist() {
+        AIOpsRequest request = new AIOpsRequest();
+        request.setAlertName("HighCPUUsage");
+        request.setService("payment-service");
+        request.setSeverity("P1");
+        request.setTimeRange("last_15m");
+        request.setDescription("CPU usage is above 80%");
+
+        String prompt = service.buildTaskPrompt(request);
+
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("AIOps scope mode: PAYLOAD_TARGETED"));
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("primary and only main diagnosis target"));
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("queryPrometheusAlerts only to verify"));
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("do not create full root-cause or remediation sections"));
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("Related Risk"));
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("告警: HighCPUUsage"));
+        assertTrue(prompt.contains("服务: payment-service"));
+        assertFalse(prompt.contains("AIOps scope mode: AUTO_DISCOVERY"));
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void buildTaskPromptUsesAutoDiscoveryModeWhenAlertPayloadIsMissing() {
+        String nullRequestPrompt = service.buildTaskPrompt(null);
+
+        assertTrue(nullRequestPrompt.contains("AIOps scope mode: AUTO_DISCOVERY"));
+        assertTrue(nullRequestPrompt.contains("First call queryPrometheusAlerts"));
+        assertTrue(nullRequestPrompt.contains("current active/firing alerts"));
+        assertFalse(nullRequestPrompt.contains("AIOps scope mode: PAYLOAD_TARGETED"));
+
+        AIOpsRequest userRequestOnly = new AIOpsRequest();
+        userRequestOnly.setUserRequest("check what is firing now");
+
+        String userRequestOnlyPrompt = service.buildTaskPrompt(userRequestOnly);
+
+        assertTrue(userRequestOnlyPrompt.contains("AIOps scope mode: AUTO_DISCOVERY"));
+        assertTrue(userRequestOnlyPrompt.contains("First call queryPrometheusAlerts"));
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void persistFinalReportUpdatesDiagnosisSessionAnswer() {
+        DiagnosisSession session = DiagnosisSession.builder()
+                .sessionId("aiops-session-001")
+                .query("AI Ops 告警分析")
+                .status("SUCCESS")
+                .agentFlow("AI_OPS")
+                .build();
+        when(diagnosisSessionRepository.findBySessionId("aiops-session-001")).thenReturn(Optional.of(session));
+
+        service.persistFinalReport("aiops-session-001", "# 告警分析报告");
+
+        assertEquals("# 告警分析报告", session.getAnswer());
+        verify(diagnosisSessionRepository).save(session);
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void persistFinalReportSkipsBlankInput() {
+        service.persistFinalReport("aiops-session-001", " ");
+
+        verifyNoInteractions(diagnosisSessionRepository);
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void backfillSessionMetricsUsesRealToolInvocationCount() {
+        DiagnosisSession session = DiagnosisSession.builder()
+                .sessionId("aiops-session-002")
+                .build();
+        AgentStep stepWithTool = AgentStep.builder()
+                .sessionId("aiops-session-002")
+                .hasToolCall(true)
+                .tokenCount(10)
+                .build();
+        AgentStep stepWithoutTool = AgentStep.builder()
+                .sessionId("aiops-session-002")
+                .hasToolCall(false)
+                .tokenCount(20)
+                .build();
+        when(agentStepRepository.findBySessionIdOrderByStepIndex("aiops-session-002"))
+                .thenReturn(List.of(stepWithTool, stepWithoutTool));
+        when(toolInvocationRepository.countBySessionId("aiops-session-002")).thenReturn(11L);
+
+        ReflectionTestUtils.invokeMethod(service, "backfillSessionMetrics", session);
+
+        assertEquals(2, session.getStepCount());
+        assertEquals(30, session.getTotalTokenCount());
+        assertEquals(11, session.getToolCallCount());
+    }
+}
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.AgentStep;
 import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.DiagnosisSession;
 import com.superbiz.agent.repository.AgentStepRepository;
 import com.superbiz.agent.repository.DiagnosisSessionRepository;
+import com.superbiz.agent.repository.ToolInvocationRepository;
 import com.superbiz.agent.tool.LookupKnowledgeTool;
 import com.superbiz.agent.tool.RetrievedDocTracker;
 import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
@@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ class ChatServiceSequentialAgentTest {
        });
        when(agentStepRepository.findById(any())).thenReturn(Optional.of(new AgentStep()));
        when(agentStepRepository.findBySessionIdOrderByStepIndex(anyString())).thenReturn(List.of());
+        ToolInvocationRepository toolInvocationRepository = mock(ToolInvocationRepository.class);
+        when(toolInvocationRepository.countBySessionId(anyString())).thenReturn(0L);

        EvaluationService evaluationService = mock(EvaluationService.class);
        RetrievedDocTracker retrievedDocTracker = mock(RetrievedDocTracker.class);
@@ -158,6 +161,7 @@ class ChatServiceSequentialAgentTest {
        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "queryLogsTools", new QueryLogsTools(mock(ToolInvocationRecorder.class)));
        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "diagnosisSessionRepository", diagnosisSessionRepository);
        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "agentStepRepository", agentStepRepository);
+        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "toolInvocationRepository", toolInvocationRepository);
        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "evaluationService", evaluationService);
        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "retrievedDocTracker", retrievedDocTracker);
        ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "knowledgeDomainService", knowledgeDomainService);