fix: avoid low-confidence supervisor retry by default
This commit is contained in:
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ public class ChatService {
|
||||
@Value("${verifier.low-confidence-threshold:0.5}")
|
||||
private double verifierLowConfidenceThreshold;
|
||||
|
||||
@Value("${chat.complex.retry-on-low-confidence:false}")
|
||||
private boolean retryOnLowConfidence;
|
||||
|
||||
/** 多 Agent Chat 的 Prompt */
|
||||
private String chatPlannerPrompt;
|
||||
private String chatExecutorPrompt;
|
||||
@@ -211,16 +214,19 @@ public class ChatService {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* 动态构建方法工具数组
|
||||
* 根据 cls.mock-enabled 决定是否包含 QueryLogsTools
|
||||
* 根据已注入的 Bean 暴露本地工具,避免 mock/真实模式下漏注入。
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public Object[] buildMethodToolsArray() {
|
||||
List<Object> methodTools = new ArrayList<>();
|
||||
methodTools.add(dateTimeTools);
|
||||
methodTools.add(lookupKnowledgeTool);
|
||||
if (queryLogsTools != null) {
|
||||
// Mock 模式:包含 QueryLogsTools
|
||||
return new Object[]{dateTimeTools, lookupKnowledgeTool};
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// 真实模式:不包含 QueryLogsTools(由 MCP 提供日志查询功能)
|
||||
return new Object[]{dateTimeTools, lookupKnowledgeTool, queryMetricsTools};
|
||||
methodTools.add(queryLogsTools);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (queryMetricsTools != null) {
|
||||
methodTools.add(queryMetricsTools);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return methodTools.toArray();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -436,7 +442,10 @@ public class ChatService {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (finalDecision.groundednessScore() >= verifierLowConfidenceThreshold || round == 2) {
|
||||
boolean shouldRetry = retryOnLowConfidence
|
||||
&& finalDecision.groundednessScore() < verifierLowConfidenceThreshold
|
||||
&& round < 2;
|
||||
if (!shouldRetry) {
|
||||
answer = buildLowConfidenceOutput(answer, finalDecision);
|
||||
persistVerifierEvaluation(session, finalDecision, round);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package com.superbiz.agent.service;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.superbiz.agent.agent.tool.DateTimeTools;
|
||||
import com.superbiz.agent.agent.tool.QueryLogsTools;
|
||||
import com.superbiz.agent.agent.tool.QueryMetricsTools;
|
||||
import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.AgentStep;
|
||||
import com.superbiz.agent.domain.entity.DiagnosisSession;
|
||||
import com.superbiz.agent.repository.AgentStepRepository;
|
||||
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ import java.util.Optional;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
|
||||
|
||||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
|
||||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertSame;
|
||||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
|
||||
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any;
|
||||
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.anyString;
|
||||
@@ -33,9 +35,81 @@ class ChatServiceSupervisorAgentTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void executeChatComplexInvokesSupervisorFlow() throws Exception {
|
||||
ChatService chatService = new ChatService();
|
||||
ChatService chatService = createChatService();
|
||||
ScriptedChatModel chatModel = new ScriptedChatModel();
|
||||
|
||||
ChatService.ChatResult result = chatService.executeChatComplex(
|
||||
chatModel,
|
||||
new ToolCallback[0],
|
||||
"请分析订单支付超时的原因,并给出修复建议",
|
||||
List.of(),
|
||||
"supervisor-test-session"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals("EXECUTOR_FINAL_ANSWER", result.answer());
|
||||
assertEquals("supervisor-test-session", result.sessionId());
|
||||
assertEquals(List.of("chat_planner", "chat_executor", "chat_verifier", "FINISH"), chatModel.decisions);
|
||||
assertTrue(chatModel.sawVerifierPrompt);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void executeChatComplexDoesNotRetryLowConfidenceByDefault() throws Exception {
|
||||
ChatService chatService = createChatService();
|
||||
ScriptedChatModel chatModel = new ScriptedChatModel("""
|
||||
{
|
||||
"verdict": "LOW_CONFID",
|
||||
"groundedness_score": 0.1,
|
||||
"critical_fact_count": 1,
|
||||
"facts_checked": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"fact": "missing direct evidence",
|
||||
"is_critical": true,
|
||||
"verification": "no_evidence",
|
||||
"detail": "scripted evidence gap",
|
||||
"evidence_refs": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rationale": "scripted low confidence"
|
||||
}
|
||||
""");
|
||||
|
||||
ChatService.ChatResult result = chatService.executeChatComplex(
|
||||
chatModel,
|
||||
new ToolCallback[0],
|
||||
"请分析订单支付超时的原因,并给出修复建议",
|
||||
List.of(),
|
||||
"supervisor-low-confidence-session"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assertTrue(result.answer().contains("EXECUTOR_FINAL_ANSWER"));
|
||||
assertEquals(List.of("chat_planner", "chat_executor", "chat_verifier", "FINISH"), chatModel.decisions);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void buildMethodToolsArrayIncludesLogsAndMetricsWhenAvailable() {
|
||||
ChatService chatService = new ChatService();
|
||||
DateTimeTools dateTimeTools = new DateTimeTools();
|
||||
LookupKnowledgeTool lookupKnowledgeTool = new LookupKnowledgeTool();
|
||||
QueryLogsTools queryLogsTools = new QueryLogsTools(mock(ToolInvocationRecorder.class));
|
||||
QueryMetricsTools queryMetricsTools = new QueryMetricsTools(mock(ToolInvocationRecorder.class));
|
||||
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "dateTimeTools", dateTimeTools);
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "lookupKnowledgeTool", lookupKnowledgeTool);
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "queryLogsTools", queryLogsTools);
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "queryMetricsTools", queryMetricsTools);
|
||||
|
||||
Object[] methodTools = chatService.buildMethodToolsArray();
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(4, methodTools.length);
|
||||
assertSame(dateTimeTools, methodTools[0]);
|
||||
assertSame(lookupKnowledgeTool, methodTools[1]);
|
||||
assertSame(queryLogsTools, methodTools[2]);
|
||||
assertSame(queryMetricsTools, methodTools[3]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private ChatService createChatService() {
|
||||
ChatService chatService = new ChatService();
|
||||
|
||||
DiagnosisSessionRepository diagnosisSessionRepository = mock(DiagnosisSessionRepository.class);
|
||||
when(diagnosisSessionRepository.findBySessionId(anyString())).thenReturn(Optional.empty());
|
||||
when(diagnosisSessionRepository.save(any(DiagnosisSession.class))).thenAnswer(invocation -> invocation.getArgument(0));
|
||||
@@ -75,19 +149,7 @@ class ChatServiceSupervisorAgentTest {
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "chatPlannerPrompt", "PLANNER_TEST_PROMPT");
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "chatExecutorPrompt", "EXECUTOR_TEST_PROMPT");
|
||||
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(chatService, "chatVerifierPrompt", "VERIFIER_TEST_PROMPT");
|
||||
|
||||
ChatService.ChatResult result = chatService.executeChatComplex(
|
||||
chatModel,
|
||||
new ToolCallback[0],
|
||||
"请分析订单支付超时的原因,并给出修复建议",
|
||||
List.of(),
|
||||
"supervisor-test-session"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals("EXECUTOR_FINAL_ANSWER", result.answer());
|
||||
assertEquals("supervisor-test-session", result.sessionId());
|
||||
assertEquals(List.of("chat_planner", "chat_executor", "chat_verifier", "FINISH"), chatModel.decisions);
|
||||
assertTrue(chatModel.sawVerifierPrompt);
|
||||
return chatService;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static final class ScriptedChatModel implements ChatModel {
|
||||
@@ -96,6 +158,31 @@ class ChatServiceSupervisorAgentTest {
|
||||
private int decisionIndex;
|
||||
private String promptText = "";
|
||||
private boolean sawVerifierPrompt;
|
||||
private final String verifierOutput;
|
||||
|
||||
private ScriptedChatModel() {
|
||||
this("""
|
||||
{
|
||||
"verdict": "PASS",
|
||||
"groundedness_score": 1.0,
|
||||
"critical_fact_count": 1,
|
||||
"facts_checked": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"fact": "executor answer generated",
|
||||
"is_critical": true,
|
||||
"verification": "direct_evidence",
|
||||
"detail": "covered by scripted verifier",
|
||||
"evidence_refs": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rationale": "scripted pass"
|
||||
}
|
||||
""");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private ScriptedChatModel(String verifierOutput) {
|
||||
this.verifierOutput = verifierOutput;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public ChatResponse call(Prompt prompt) {
|
||||
@@ -110,23 +197,7 @@ class ChatServiceSupervisorAgentTest {
|
||||
text = "EXECUTOR_FINAL_ANSWER";
|
||||
} else if (promptText.contains("VERIFIER_TEST_PROMPT")) {
|
||||
sawVerifierPrompt = true;
|
||||
text = """
|
||||
{
|
||||
"verdict": "PASS",
|
||||
"groundedness_score": 1.0,
|
||||
"critical_fact_count": 1,
|
||||
"facts_checked": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"fact": "executor answer generated",
|
||||
"is_critical": true,
|
||||
"verification": "direct_evidence",
|
||||
"detail": "covered by scripted verifier",
|
||||
"evidence_refs": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rationale": "scripted pass"
|
||||
}
|
||||
""";
|
||||
text = verifierOutput;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
text = "UNEXPECTED_PROMPT";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user