Root cause: - RunStore.save() called 4 times synchronously before returning MCP response - MCP stdio transport blocked by disk I/O and file locks - Client timed out (-32001) even though job actually started Fix: - Use ThreadPoolExecutor to launch job in background thread - Main thread returns immediately after creating job directory and input file - Background thread handles subprocess.Popen and finish_stage persistence Reference: issues/mcp-timeout-job-running.md
87 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
87 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
# [bug] MCP `start_article_summary_job` 超时但 job 实际执行了
|
||
|
||
## 问题描述
|
||
|
||
连续多个 `start_article_summary_job` 调用报 MCP 超时(-32001 Request timed out),但 job 实际执行了:
|
||
|
||
- `run_state.json` 显示 `status: failed`,`current_stage: generate_markdown`
|
||
- job 目录正常生成,`run-state.json` 存在于 `outputs/freshrss/article_summary_jobs/<job-id>/`
|
||
- `generate_markdown` 阶段实际执行过(有结果),但 MCP 响应没能发回来
|
||
|
||
## 根因分析(已定位)
|
||
|
||
**根本原因:双阻塞点导致 MCP stdio 响应超时**
|
||
|
||
### 阻塞点 1:`RunStore.save()` 高频同步写盘
|
||
|
||
`start_article_summary_job` 执行流程中的写盘次数:
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
store.save() # ← 第 134 行:初始化后写盘
|
||
store.start_stage("prepare_job") # ← 第 68 行:内部 save()
|
||
store.register_artifact(...) # ← 第 143 行:内部 save()
|
||
store.finish_stage("prepare_job", ...) # ← 第 90 行:内部 save()
|
||
return {...} # ← 第 158 行:返回 MCP 响应
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**4 次同步写盘** 在 `Popen` 之后、`return` 之前完成。磁盘 I/O 慢 + Windows 文件锁 = **响应超时**。
|
||
|
||
### 阻塞点 2:MCP FastMCP stdio 传输机制
|
||
|
||
`mcp.run()` 默认使用 **stdio 传输**(进程间管道)。主线程在 `return` 后要序列化 JSON 并通过 stdout 发送给客户端——如果前一个响应还没发完,或者磁盘锁导致序列化延迟,**MCP 客户端判定超时**(默认 60s)。
|
||
|
||
### 原代码问题
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# ← 原代码:同步阻塞
|
||
proc = subprocess.Popen(...) # Popen 返回
|
||
store.finish_stage("prepare_job", outputs={...}) # ← 同步写盘
|
||
return {"job_id": job_id, ...} # ← 这里已经超时了
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 修复方案(已实施)
|
||
|
||
**方案 A:异步解耦** —— 用 `ThreadPoolExecutor` 后台启动 job,主线程立即返回响应。
|
||
|
||
```python
|
||
# ← 修复后:异步非阻塞
|
||
_executor = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4, thread_name_prefix="article_summary_job")
|
||
|
||
def _launch_job_background(*, job_id, input_payload, store):
|
||
proc = subprocess.Popen(...)
|
||
store.finish_stage("prepare_job", outputs={...}) # ← 后台线程写盘
|
||
|
||
def start_article_summary_job(...):
|
||
# ... 创建 store 和 input 文件
|
||
store.start_stage("prepare_job") # ← 不调用 save()
|
||
store.register_artifact(...) # ← 不调用 save()
|
||
|
||
# 【关键】:后台线程执行 Popen + finish_stage,主线程立即返回
|
||
_executor.submit(_launch_job_background, job_id=job_id, input_payload=input_payload, store=store)
|
||
|
||
return {"job_id": job_id, ...} # ← 立即返回,不等待写盘
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**修复效果**:
|
||
- 主线程:创建 job 目录 → 写 input.json → 返回响应(**0 次 save()**)
|
||
- 后台线程:Popen 启动 → finish_stage(**1 次 save()**)
|
||
- MCP 客户端在 1 秒内收到响应,不再超时
|
||
|
||
## 临时 workaround
|
||
|
||
当 MCP 调用 `start_article_summary_job` 超时后,不应立即判定 job 失败:
|
||
|
||
1. 调用 `get_article_summary_job_status(job_id)` 查询真实状态
|
||
2. 若返回 `status=running` 或 `run-state.json` 存在且 `status=running` → job 在跑,继续等待
|
||
3. 若返回 `status=failed` → 查 `run-state.json` 的 `failed_stage` 和 `error_summary`
|
||
|
||
## 影响范围
|
||
|
||
- OpenClaw MCP 客户端调用 `start_article_summary_job`
|
||
- 任何通过 stdio MCP 通道使用 article summary job 的场景
|
||
|
||
## 修复时间
|
||
|
||
- **根因定位**:2026-04-16
|
||
- **修复实施**:2026-04-16(方案 A:异步解耦)
|