Files
SuperBizAgent-java/devflow/projects/2026-07-04-aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry/decisions.md
T

69 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown

# Decisions: aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry
## Clarify
- Entry summary: make the legacy AIOps SSE endpoint a traceable alert diagnosis entry for the Agent Engineer interview MVP.
- Slug: `aiops-traceable-diagnosis-entry`
- Scale: standard-light, because this extends one public endpoint and reuses existing persistence/trace infrastructure.
## Context
- `mvp-demo-trace-acceptance` already added `GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace`.
- `chat-verifier-agent` made the chat path stronger than the older AIOps path.
- Current AIOps value is as a second entry point: system alert -> automated diagnosis -> evidence trace.
## Grill Question Pool
| # | Dimension | Question | Mode | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Positioning | Is AIOps an independent product path or an alert-triggered sibling of Chat Diagnosis? | user-interview | Resolved: sibling entry, unified trace story |
| Q2 | API | Should we keep `/api/ai_ops` or add a new endpoint? | evidence-driven | Resolved: keep existing endpoint and extend optional body |
| Q3 | Input | What is the minimum alert payload? | user-interview | Resolved: `sessionId`, `alertName`, `service`, `severity`, `description`, `timeRange`, plus `userRequest` fallback |
| Q4 | Output | How does the caller learn the trace session id? | evidence-driven | Resolved: first SSE event uses type `session` |
| Q5 | Trace | Must AIOps be replayable with existing trace API? | evidence-driven | Resolved: yes, this is the main acceptance criterion |
| Q6 | Verifier | Must this slice add AIOps Verifier? | user-interview | Resolved: no, defer as follow-up |
| Q7 | Compatibility | Should no-body calls still work? | evidence-driven | Resolved: yes, preserve old demo behavior |
| Q8 | GitNexus | Should unavailable GitNexus block implementation? | user-interview | Resolved: skip GitNexus by user decision |
## Evidence-Driven Conclusions
| Conclusion | Evidence Source | Result |
|---|---|---|
| AIOps is currently isolated from request-driven trace replay. | `ChatController.aiOps()` has no request body; `AiOpsService` creates its own random session id. | Extend endpoint and service. |
| No schema change is needed. | `DiagnosisSession` already has `query`, `agentFlow`, `answer`, counts, and status. | Reuse existing table. |
| Trace API can already replay AIOps if session id and answer are persisted. | `DiagnosisTraceService` loads by session id and is flow-agnostic. | Keep trace API unchanged. |
| Blast radius is moderate and local. | `rg` shows only `ChatController` calls `executeAiOpsAnalysis` and `extractFinalReport`. | Change service/controller carefully and add tests. |
## User-Interview Confirmations
| Topic | User Words | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Use sm-flow | "可以,改造一下AIOps 接口,用sm-flow流程看看" | Use OpenSpec + devflow. |
| GitNexus | "跳过gitnexus把" | Record skip and use local impact analysis. |
| Proceed after Grill | "可以" | Continue with lightweight Grill conclusions. |
## Key Decisions
- Keep `/api/ai_ops` and make its body optional.
- Emit `SseMessage.type=session` before long-running analysis starts.
- Store AIOps request summary in `diagnosis_session.query`.
- Store final report in `diagnosis_session.answer`.
- Defer AIOps Verifier to a later change so this slice stays focused.
## Architecture Audit
```text
POST /api/ai_ops
-> optional AIOpsRequest
-> resolve sessionId
-> create diagnosis_session(agentFlow=AI_OPS)
-> run ai_ops_supervisor(planner, executor)
-> AgentLoggingHook persists steps
-> tools persist invocations under SessionContextHolder
-> extract final report
-> persist answer
-> GET /api/diagnosis/{sessionId}/trace replays the run
```
Risk level: medium. The endpoint is public and SSE-based, but the change is additive and does not change the chat diagnosis path or database schema.